icon
icon
icon
icon
$300 Off
$300 Off

News /

Articles /

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Urges NET Power (NPWR) Investors to Act Amid Ongoing Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Julian WestTuesday, Apr 22, 2025 2:33 pm ET
25min read

Investors in net power Inc. (NYSE: NPWR) are under urgent pressure to evaluate their legal options following an active securities fraud class action lawsuit alleging material misrepresentations by the company and its executives. Led by Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP and other prominent law firms, the case—Luciani v. NET Power Inc., No. 25-cv-00296 (M.D.N.C.)—accuses the company of misleading investors about its flagship Project Permian, a carbon-capture power plant. With a June 17, 2025, deadline to join as a lead plaintiff, the stakes for shareholders are high.

Key Allegations: Project Permian’s Timeline and Cost Deception

The lawsuit centers on claims that NET Power misrepresented the feasibility of Project Permian, a $2 billion utility-scale power plant in Texas. Key allegations include:
1. False Timeline Promises: The company initially assured investors the plant would be operational by 2026, despite internal knowledge of supply chain delays and site-specific logistical challenges. By November 2023, NET Power admitted the timeline had slipped to late 2027 or early 2028, causing a 18.5% stock plunge to $10.85.
2. Cost Overruns Concealed: In March 2025, the company revealed Project Permian’s costs had soared to $1.7–2.0 billion, nearly double the prior $1.1 billion estimate. This disclosure triggered a 31.5% drop to $4.75.
3. Executive Departures: By April 2025, the resignation of the COO and CFO further rattled investors, pushing shares down another 5.8% to $2.13.

Stock Price Impact: A Steep Decline Reflects Investor Losses

The lawsuit underscores how repeated setbacks eroded investor confidence. The stock’s trajectory since 2023 paints a stark picture:

NPWR Trend

  • June 2023: Shares traded at around $12.
  • November 2023: Dropped to $10.85 after the first delay announcement.
  • March 2025: Fell to $4.75 following cost revisions.
  • April 2025: Closed at $2.13 after executive departures.

This reflects a 96% decline from pre-lawsuit highs, with investors suffering substantial losses.

Legal Deadlines: Act Before June 17, 2025

The case is now in its critical phase. Investors who purchased or held NPWR shares between June 9, 2023, and March 7, 2025, may qualify to join the class action. However, those seeking to serve as lead plaintiff must file motions by June 17, 2025. Key deadlines and contacts include:

  • Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP: Charles Linehan, Esq. (310-201-9150, shareholders@glancylaw.com).
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP: J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal (800-449-4900, info@rgrdlaw.com).

Why This Matters for Investors

NET Power’s case highlights the risks of investing in high-stakes energy projects with unproven technologies. While the company’s carbon-capture innovation is promising, its failure to disclose critical risks—such as supply chain bottlenecks and site-specific challenges—violated securities laws. The lawsuit seeks to recover losses for investors misled by optimistic projections.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for Energy Investors

The NET Power lawsuit serves as a reminder of the fragile balance between innovation and transparency in capital-intensive industries. With $1.7 billion in projected costs and delays stretching into 2029, the company’s initial timeline and budget estimates now appear deeply flawed.

For investors, the path forward is clear:
1. Evaluate Losses: Calculate holdings during the Class Period.
2. Consult Legal Counsel: Contact law firms by June 17 to explore lead plaintiff status or class membership.
3. Monitor SEC Filings: The case could set precedents for how companies disclose risks in emerging sectors like clean energy.

The stock’s 96% decline since 2023 underscores the severity of the fraud allegations. As Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP emphasizes, timely action is critical to preserve recovery opportunities.

In a sector where technological promises often outpace reality, this case reinforces the need for rigorous due diligence—and the consequences of corporate overreach.

Comments

Add a public comment...
Post
User avatar and name identifying the post author
fmaz008
04/22
Cost overruns are the new normal in green energy. But hiding them? That's where things get ugly.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
turkeychicken
04/22
@fmaz008 True, cost overruns r common. But hiding them? That's sus.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
WickedWhizKid
04/22
@fmaz008 Green energy projects r risky. Due diligence is key.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
cuzimrave
04/22
$NPWR rollercoaster's wild. If you're still holding, better check your stop-losses and consider legal options.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
OutsidePerspective27
04/22
@cuzimrave How long you been holding NPWR? Curious if you're thinking of going long again or just cutting losses.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Most_Caramel_8001
04/22
If you're still holding NPWR, calculate your losses and reach out to lawyers. Time's running out to join the class action.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Swing_Fickle
04/22
@Most_Caramel_8001 How long you been holding NPWR? And what's your prediction for the stock after this lawsuit wraps up?
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Overlord1317
04/22
Investors, don't sleep on this. Class actions can mean big payouts if NPWR gets nailed for fraud. 💰
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
EmergencyWitness7
04/22
@Overlord1317 You think NPWR's gonna crash harder?
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
the_doonz
04/22
$NPWR's rollercoaster shows risks of green tech hype. Always look for red flags in projections and exec departures.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
SuperNewk
04/22
Supply chain delays are the silent killers of project timelines. NET Power should've seen it coming.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
superbilliam
04/22
Carbon capture tech is crucial, but transparency is king. NET Power's missteps cost bagholders dearly.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Traditional_Wave8524
04/22
$NPWR rollercoaster shows risks of green energy hype.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
TobyAguecheek
04/22
Carbon capture tech sounds dope, but transparency matters
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Zhukov-74
04/22
@TobyAguecheek Totally, transparency's key.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
amanoraim
04/22
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP knows securities law inside out. They're the real deal for lead plaintiff counsel.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
portrayaloflife
04/22
Law firms riding this wave like 🏄♂️ surfers!
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Latter-Truth-5968
04/22
@portrayaloflife Hope they don't wipe out on this one.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
the_doonz
04/22
I bailed on $NPWR early. Holding $TSLA and $AAPL instead. Diversification keeps my portfolio from getting too toxic.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
TheLastMemeLeft
04/22
Carbon capture tech sounds dope, but transparency is key. Don't get rekt by hidden risks, peeps.
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
ImplementEither7716
04/22
The energy sector's all about risk and reward. NET Power's case is a cautionary tale for anyone chasing rainbows. 😅
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
fit_steve
04/22
OMG!The NPWR stock generated the signal signal, from which I have benefited significantly!
0
Reply
User avatar and name identifying the post author
Colonel_Jacobs_
04/22
@fit_steve How long you held NPWR? Was it a quick trade or long-term play?
0
Reply
Disclaimer: The news articles available on this platform are generated in whole or in part by artificial intelligence and may not have been reviewed or fact checked by human editors. While we make reasonable efforts to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the truthfulness, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. It is your sole responsibility to independently verify any facts, statements, or claims prior to acting upon them. Ainvest Fintech Inc expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, or harm arising from the use of or reliance on AI-generated content, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.
You Can Understand News Better with AI.
Whats the News impact on stock market?
Its impact is
fork
logo
AInvest
Aime Coplilot
Invest Smarter With AI Power.
Open App