German Court Rules Apple Watch Not Actually Carbon Neutral
ByAinvest
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2025 9:05 am ET1min read
AAPL--
Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015. The company offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality. However, the German court's decision suggests that Apple's marketing may have overstated the environmental benefits of its products.
The ruling comes at a time when Apple is facing legal challenges over its health technology features. Masimo Corp., a medical technology firm, has accused Apple of infringing on its pulse oximetry patents. Masimo has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Protection for reversing its prior ruling on the import of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches, which had been blocked due to patent infringement claims.
The Apple Watch has been positioned as a critical health and wellness device, with Apple exploring broader ambitions such as noninvasive glucose monitoring. Rivals like Samsung Electronics and Alphabet Inc.'s Google are also advancing health-focused smartwatch features, intensifying competition in the wearable space.
Apple's stock price dropped 1.97% during regular trading and slipped an additional 0.18% in after-hours trading following the German court's ruling. Despite this, Benzinga's Edge Stock Rankings indicate that AAPL maintains strong momentum across short, medium, and long-term timeframes.
References:
[1] https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/25/08/47252149/apple-restores-blood-oxygen-tracking-to-watch-after-customs-ruling-masimo-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-over-patent-rights
A German court has ruled that Apple's claim of the Apple Watch being carbon neutral is misleading. The court found that Apple misled consumers by describing the Apple Watch as a CO2-neutral product. The ruling means that Apple must alter or remove language relating to the devices being carbon neutral in German retail locations and online stores. Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015, and offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality.
A German court has ruled that Apple's claim of the Apple Watch being carbon neutral is misleading. The court found that Apple misled consumers by describing the Apple Watch as a CO2-neutral product. This ruling means that Apple must alter or remove language relating to the devices being carbon neutral in German retail locations and online stores.Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015. The company offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality. However, the German court's decision suggests that Apple's marketing may have overstated the environmental benefits of its products.
The ruling comes at a time when Apple is facing legal challenges over its health technology features. Masimo Corp., a medical technology firm, has accused Apple of infringing on its pulse oximetry patents. Masimo has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Protection for reversing its prior ruling on the import of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches, which had been blocked due to patent infringement claims.
The Apple Watch has been positioned as a critical health and wellness device, with Apple exploring broader ambitions such as noninvasive glucose monitoring. Rivals like Samsung Electronics and Alphabet Inc.'s Google are also advancing health-focused smartwatch features, intensifying competition in the wearable space.
Apple's stock price dropped 1.97% during regular trading and slipped an additional 0.18% in after-hours trading following the German court's ruling. Despite this, Benzinga's Edge Stock Rankings indicate that AAPL maintains strong momentum across short, medium, and long-term timeframes.
References:
[1] https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/25/08/47252149/apple-restores-blood-oxygen-tracking-to-watch-after-customs-ruling-masimo-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-over-patent-rights

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet