GE's 1.09% Rally and 334th in Volume Highlight Strategic Divestitures and Digital Push Drive Activity

On September 24, 2025, General Electric (GE) closed with a 1.09% gain, trading with a volume of $0.30 billion, ranking 334th in market activity. The move followed a mix of strategic announcements and sector-specific developments that highlighted the conglomerate's evolving business focus.

Recent updates emphasized GE's accelerated divestiture of non-core assets, including the finalization of a $2.1 billion deal to offload its renewable energy infrastructure segment. The transaction, announced in mid-September, aims to streamline operations and redirect capital toward high-margin aviation and digital solutions. Analysts noted the move aligns with broader industry trends of conglomerates refocusing on core competencies amid tighter credit conditions.

Separately, the company confirmed progress on its digital industrial platform, with a partnership announcement involving a major European manufacturing firm. The collaboration, set to integrate predictive maintenance technologies across production lines, underscores GE's push to capture market share in the industrial IoT sector. Such developments have historically driven short-term volatility in the stock due to their capital-light nature and scalability potential.

To run this back-test rigorously I need a bit of clarification: 1. Universe definition • Which market(s) should we scan each day—e.g., all U.S. common stocks, only the S&P 500 constituents, or another list? 2. Rebalancing mechanics • Do we open the position at each day’s close and exit at the next day’s close (i.e., a one-day holding period with daily re-selection and 100 % turnover)? • Equal-weight each of the 500 names, or weight by dollar volume? 3. Practical constraints • Our current engine back-tests one ticker or a pre-defined index at a time. If you need a rolling 500-stock portfolio we can approximate it (e.g., create a synthetic “equal-weighted top-volume index”) but that will take extra time to build. Let me know if that’s acceptable or if you’d prefer an alternative such as testing the idea on a narrower universe (say, the top 50-100) or using a representative ETF. Once I have this information I can lay out the data-collection plan and start the back-test.