Gap's Q2 2025 Earnings Call: Contradictions Emerge on Tariff Impact, Marketing Efficiency, and Pricing Strategy
Generated by AI AgentAinvest Earnings Call Digest
Friday, Aug 29, 2025 12:52 am ET3min read
GAP--
Aime Summary 
The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call
Date of Call: August 29, 2025
Financials Results
- Revenue: $3.7B, flat YOY (company comps +1%)
- EPS: $0.57 per diluted share, up 6% YOY (vs $0.54 prior year)
- Gross Margin: 41.2%, down 140 bps YOY; up 360 bps vs two years ago
- Operating Margin: 7.8%, down 10 bps YOY
Guidance:
- FY2025 net sales expected up 1%–2% YOY.
- FY2025 gross margin to deleverage ~70–90 bps YOY, driven by net tariff impact of ~100–110 bps (higher-cost units begin flowing in Q3).
- FY2025 SG&A to leverage slightly.
- FY2025 operating margin expected ~6.7%–7.0%, including ~$150–$175M tariff impact (~100–110 bps).
- Q3 net sales expected up 1.5%–2.5% YOY.
- Q3 gross margin to deleverage ~150–170 bps YOY with ~200 bps tariff impact; slight SG&A deleverage.
- FY2025 capex now $500M–$550M.
- Do not expect 2026 annualized tariffs to cause further operating income declines; plan to mitigate fully over time.
Business Commentary:
* Strong Financial Performance and Brand Momentum: - GapGAP-- Inc. reported comparable sales up1% in Q2, with its three largest brands, Old Navy, Gap, and Banana Republic, posting positive comps. - The company delivered an operating margin of 7.8%, EPS of $0.57, up 6% year-over-year, and ended the quarter with strong cash balances of approximately $2.4 billion. - This performance was attributed to maintaining financial and operational rigor, reinvigorating brands, and investing in technology.- Brand Reinvigoration Success:
- Old Navy achieved a
2%comp on top of last year's5%, posting its highest-volume denim quarter in 10 years. - Gap's brand was reignited with a
4%comp, marking its seventh consecutive quarter of positive comps. The success was driven by strategic pursuits in key categories like denim and active, along with effective storytelling and marketing campaigns.
Athleta's Reset and Leadership Change:
- Athleta's net sales decreased
11%year-over-year, but the company is undertaking a purposeful reset year focused on stabilizing and reviving the brand. - Maggie Gauger, a veteran from NikeNKE--, was appointed as the new President and CEO of Athleta.
The reset aims to realign the brand with customer expectations and drive product and marketing improvements over time.
Tariff Impact and Mitigation Strategies:
- Gap Inc. anticipates an estimated net tariff impact of approximately
$150 million to $175 million, equating to about100 to 110 basis pointsof operating margin. - The company is employing a balanced approach to mitigate tariff pressures, including adjustments in sourcing, manufacturing, and targeted pricing.
- The strategy aims to offset tariff impacts and maintain long-term profitability.

Sentiment Analysis:
- Management beat profit expectations and met top-line goals (EPS $0.57, up 6% YOY; comps +1%). They reaffirmed FY2025 net sales growth of 1%–2%, but lowered profit outlook due to tariffs: gross margin deleverage 70–90 bps and operating margin 6.7%–7.0%. Q3 outlook is stronger on revenue (up 1.5%–2.5% YOY) but calls for gross margin deleverage of 150–170 bps on ~200 bps tariff impact.
Q&A:
- Question from Alexandra Ann Straton (Morgan Stanley): You lowered full-year EBIT/EPS despite Q2 beat—primarily tariffs? How do tariff dynamics differ for you versus peers?
Response: Guidance cut is driven by $150–$175M tariff impact (~100–110 bps to operating margin); ex-tariffs, gross and operating margins would expand, and mitigation plans are underway.
- Question from Alexandra Ann Straton (Morgan Stanley): Longer term, is double-digit operating margin still achievable?
Response: They see long-term operating margin expansion potential, expect to fully mitigate tariffs over time, and aim for sustainable profitable growth.
- Question from Marni Shapiro (The Retail Tracker): At Old Navy, are better stores/marketing requiring higher spend, or is it merchandising? And at Gap, is AUR up excluding collabs?
Response: Old Navy is not spending more; improved merchandising and more efficient marketing drive results. Gap’s AUR is up even excluding collaborations; momentum reflects the reinvigoration playbook.
- Question from Brooke Siler Roach (Goldman Sachs): What drives confidence cycling tougher holiday compares at Gap and improving 2-year stacks?
Response: Consistent execution of big product plus culturally resonant campaigns (e.g., Better in Denim with strong engagement) supports continued momentum into holiday.
- Question from Matthew Robert Boss (JPMorgan): What drives Q3 revenue acceleration to +2% midpoint versus flat in Q2 and how are August trends?
Response: Strength across Old Navy, Gap, and Banana; back-to-school momentum improved in July and continued in August, especially at Gap and Old Navy.
- Question from Matthew Robert Boss (JPMorgan): Will tariffs pressure operating income further in 2026 at low single-digit revenue growth?
Response: They do not expect further operating income declines from 2026 tariff annualization; mitigation efforts should offset.
- Question from Lorraine Hutchinson (BofA Securities): How have pricing assumptions changed to mitigate tariffs, and why won’t H2 pressure persist into next year?
Response: Pricing remains targeted within a balanced, value-focused playbook; with clearer timing, broader mitigation actions in 2026 should offset pressures that were hard to address given the late-August tariff tranche.
- Question from Dana Lauren Telsey (Telsey Advisory Group): What were comp drivers (traffic/ticket)? How are you thinking about H2 marketing spend? Any Banana leadership update?
Response: Traffic healthy; AUR up, notably at Old Navy and Gap; Athleta used higher discounts. Marketing is more effective with lower spend via improved creative/media mix. Banana progress continues; leadership search ongoing.
- Question from Irwin Bernard Boruchow (Wells Fargo): Decompose the 150 bps merchandise margin decline vs prior guide mostly credit card—how much was card vs Athleta?
Response: About 80–90 bps from the lapping of the credit card benefit; the remainder driven by deeper Athleta discounting to clear poor sellers; other brands performed well.
Discover what executives don't want to reveal in conference calls
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet