Gap's Q2 2025 Earnings Call: Contradictions Emerge on Tariff Impact, Marketing Efficiency, and Pricing Strategy

Generated by AI AgentEarnings Decrypt
Friday, Aug 29, 2025 12:52 am ET3min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Gap Inc. reported $3.7B revenue (flat YOY) and 6% EPS growth, with 7.8% operating margin despite 140 bps gross margin decline.

- Brands like Old Navy (+2% comp) and Gap (7th consecutive positive quarter) drove growth, while Athleta (-11% sales) undergoes leadership and brand reset.

- $150-175M tariff impact pressured FY2025 guidance (6.7%-7.0% margin), but management plans sourcing/price adjustments to mitigate long-term effects.

- Q3 revenue guidance raised to +1.5%-2.5% YOY, with back-to-school momentum and improved marketing efficiency supporting brand reinvigoration strategies.

The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call

Date of Call: August 29, 2025

Financials Results

  • Revenue: $3.7B, flat YOY (company comps +1%)
  • EPS: $0.57 per diluted share, up 6% YOY (vs $0.54 prior year)
  • Gross Margin: 41.2%, down 140 bps YOY; up 360 bps vs two years ago
  • Operating Margin: 7.8%, down 10 bps YOY

Guidance:

  • FY2025 net sales expected up 1%–2% YOY.
  • FY2025 gross margin to deleverage ~70–90 bps YOY, driven by net tariff impact of ~100–110 bps (higher-cost units begin flowing in Q3).
  • FY2025 SG&A to leverage slightly.
  • FY2025 operating margin expected ~6.7%–7.0%, including ~$150–$175M tariff impact (~100–110 bps).
  • Q3 net sales expected up 1.5%–2.5% YOY.
  • Q3 gross margin to deleverage ~150–170 bps YOY with ~200 bps tariff impact; slight SG&A deleverage.
  • FY2025 capex now $500M–$550M.
  • Do not expect 2026 annualized tariffs to cause further operating income declines; plan to mitigate fully over time.

Business Commentary:

* Strong Financial Performance and Brand Momentum: - Inc. reported comparable sales up 1% in Q2, with its three largest brands, Old Navy, Gap, and Banana Republic, posting positive comps. - The company delivered an operating margin of 7.8%, EPS of $0.57, up 6% year-over-year, and ended the quarter with strong cash balances of approximately $2.4 billion. - This performance was attributed to maintaining financial and operational rigor, reinvigorating brands, and investing in technology.

  • Brand Reinvigoration Success:
  • Old Navy achieved a 2% comp on top of last year's 5%, posting its highest-volume denim quarter in 10 years.
  • Gap's brand was reignited with a 4% comp, marking its seventh consecutive quarter of positive comps.
  • The success was driven by strategic pursuits in key categories like denim and active, along with effective storytelling and marketing campaigns.

  • Athleta's Reset and Leadership Change:

  • Athleta's net sales decreased 11% year-over-year, but the company is undertaking a purposeful reset year focused on stabilizing and reviving the brand.
  • Maggie Gauger, a veteran from , was appointed as the new President and CEO of Athleta.
  • The reset aims to realign the brand with customer expectations and drive product and marketing improvements over time.

  • Tariff Impact and Mitigation Strategies:

  • Gap Inc. anticipates an estimated net tariff impact of approximately $150 million to $175 million, equating to about 100 to 110 basis points of operating margin.
  • The company is employing a balanced approach to mitigate tariff pressures, including adjustments in sourcing, manufacturing, and targeted pricing.
  • The strategy aims to offset tariff impacts and maintain long-term profitability.

Sentiment Analysis:

  • Management beat profit expectations and met top-line goals (EPS $0.57, up 6% YOY; comps +1%). They reaffirmed FY2025 net sales growth of 1%–2%, but lowered profit outlook due to tariffs: gross margin deleverage 70–90 bps and operating margin 6.7%–7.0%. Q3 outlook is stronger on revenue (up 1.5%–2.5% YOY) but calls for gross margin deleverage of 150–170 bps on ~200 bps tariff impact.

Q&A:

  • Question from Alexandra Ann Straton (Morgan Stanley): You lowered full-year EBIT/EPS despite Q2 beat—primarily tariffs? How do tariff dynamics differ for you versus peers?
    Response: Guidance cut is driven by $150–$175M tariff impact (~100–110 bps to operating margin); ex-tariffs, gross and operating margins would expand, and mitigation plans are underway.
  • Question from Alexandra Ann Straton (Morgan Stanley): Longer term, is double-digit operating margin still achievable?
    Response: They see long-term operating margin expansion potential, expect to fully mitigate tariffs over time, and aim for sustainable profitable growth.
  • Question from Marni Shapiro (The Retail Tracker): At Old Navy, are better stores/marketing requiring higher spend, or is it merchandising? And at Gap, is AUR up excluding collabs?
    Response: Old Navy is not spending more; improved merchandising and more efficient marketing drive results. Gap’s AUR is up even excluding collaborations; momentum reflects the reinvigoration playbook.
  • Question from Brooke Siler Roach (Goldman Sachs): What drives confidence cycling tougher holiday compares at Gap and improving 2-year stacks?
    Response: Consistent execution of big product plus culturally resonant campaigns (e.g., Better in Denim with strong engagement) supports continued momentum into holiday.
  • Question from Matthew Robert Boss (JPMorgan): What drives Q3 revenue acceleration to +2% midpoint versus flat in Q2 and how are August trends?
    Response: Strength across Old Navy, Gap, and Banana; back-to-school momentum improved in July and continued in August, especially at Gap and Old Navy.
  • Question from Matthew Robert Boss (JPMorgan): Will tariffs pressure operating income further in 2026 at low single-digit revenue growth?
    Response: They do not expect further operating income declines from 2026 tariff annualization; mitigation efforts should offset.
  • Question from Lorraine Hutchinson (BofA Securities): How have pricing assumptions changed to mitigate tariffs, and why won’t H2 pressure persist into next year?
    Response: Pricing remains targeted within a balanced, value-focused playbook; with clearer timing, broader mitigation actions in 2026 should offset pressures that were hard to address given the late-August tariff tranche.
  • Question from Dana Lauren Telsey (Telsey Advisory Group): What were comp drivers (traffic/ticket)? How are you thinking about H2 marketing spend? Any Banana leadership update?
    Response: Traffic healthy; AUR up, notably at Old Navy and Gap; Athleta used higher discounts. Marketing is more effective with lower spend via improved creative/media mix. Banana progress continues; leadership search ongoing.
  • Question from Irwin Bernard Boruchow (Wells Fargo): Decompose the 150 bps merchandise margin decline vs prior guide mostly credit card—how much was card vs Athleta?
    Response: About 80–90 bps from the lapping of the credit card benefit; the remainder driven by deeper Athleta discounting to clear poor sellers; other brands performed well.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet