Galaxy's Market-Making Gambit: Betting on Prediction Markets' $1T+ Surge

Generated by AI AgentJulian CruzReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 25, 2025 12:14 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

targets prediction markets via Kalshi/Polymarket partnerships, leveraging cross-asset infrastructure to supply liquidity amid $500M+ weekly trading volumes.

- Regulatory divergence creates arbitrage opportunities: Kalshi operates under CFTC, while Polymarket navigates state gambling laws, enabling Galaxy to serve both frameworks.

- $1T market potential by 2027 faces execution risks including regulatory ambiguity, capital constraints, and competition from Susquehanna/Jump Trading.

- Polymarket's $430M monthly volume surge and QCX acquisition highlight consolidation pressures as platforms battle for dominance in fragmented regulatory landscapes.

- Galaxy's success hinges on scaling liquidity provision efficiently while navigating uncertain 2026 regulatory clarity that could reshape market dynamics and revenue projections.

Galaxy Digital sees a clear path into prediction markets by applying its established cross-asset infrastructure expertise and exploiting regulatory gaps. The firm is actively exploring market-making partnerships with both Kalshi and Polymarket, positioning itself to supply critical liquidity as these event-based markets expand. This move leverages Galaxy's institutional-grade trading capabilities, honed across traditional and digital assets, which are essential for stabilizing peer-to-peer platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi that .

Regulatory divergence creates a strategic opening. Kalshi operates under CFTC registration, granting it a formal foothold in the U.S., while Polymarket navigates a patchwork of state gambling laws but

and acquisitions. Galaxy's ability to navigate this fragmented landscape-potentially offering services in both frameworks-gives it a unique arbitrage advantage as platforms compete for dominance.

The opportunity is massive. Prediction markets now handle over $500 million in weekly trading volume, with

could swell to $1 trillion by 2027. Galaxy's entry hinges on its capacity to scale liquidity provision efficiently across both regulated (Kalshi) and state-compliant (Polymarket) channels, though it faces competition from firms like Susquehanna and Jump Trading. The lack of federal oversight remains a key uncertainty, as shifting regulatory clarity could reshape the playing field rapidly.

Competitive Penetration and Market Dynamics

Kalshi's dominance in regulated prediction markets now covers 62-65% of trading volume as traditional gatekeepers like Polymarket expand aggressively. Polymarket alone hit $430 million in monthly volume-a

just months prior-fueling consolidation as it acquired CFTC-registered QCX and partnered with Robinhood. These moves signal institutional pushback against fragmented platforms, with legacy gaming firms eyeing CFTC licensing to enter the space.

The $1 trillion addressable market forecast for 2027 amplifies incentives to scale quickly, but regulatory friction remains. Political and sports contracts face scrutiny over election integrity risks and tax ambiguities, while platforms balance gambling versus trading classifications. Though growth momentum is undeniable, execution risks-including capital shortfalls for compliance and liquidity management-could slow winners if regulatory clarity lags.

Regulatory Crossroads and Execution Risks

The surge in institutional interest in prediction markets has hit regulatory roadblocks. State gambling laws now apply to platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, creating ambiguity where binary contracts on elections or sports could be classified as illegal gambling in some jurisdictions. Federal oversight remains fragmented, with no unified framework to distinguish speculative trading from gaming-a gap that

if states tighten enforcement.

Polymarket's $112 million acquisition of CFTC-registered QCX aimed to secure legitimacy, but delays in re-entering U.S. markets highlight execution risks. The platform's reliance on third-party liquidity providers like Susquehanna-to counterbalance its dominance-could

as market manipulation. Meanwhile, traditional firms entering the space face hurdles: tax classifications for event-based contracts remain unsettled, and political scrutiny over election integrity could trigger sudden compliance costs.

Without clear federal guidelines, consolidation will accelerate. Larger entities with capital to navigate state-by-state compliance may absorb niche competitors, squeezing innovation. Investors should watch for regulatory clarity in 2026-if it arrives too late, Polymarket's expansion timeline could stall further.

Growth Catalysts and Scenario Implications

Galaxy Digital's push into prediction markets could unlock meaningful revenue if market dynamics align. The sector's explosive potential is underscored by

as event-based contract demand surges. Galaxy's partnerships with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket represent a strategic play to monetize this growth .

If executed successfully, capturing 15% market share through these synergies could generate approximately $200 million in annual revenue by 2027. This hinges on seamless integration with existing platforms and sustained trading activity. However, this optimistic scenario faces material headwinds. Competition is intensifying, with firms like Susquehanna deploying aggressive liquidity strategies that could erode Galaxy's market capture potential.

Regulatory uncertainty remains a critical wildcard. Federal oversight gaps persist alongside patchwork state gambling laws, creating compliance risks that could surge if new restrictions emerge. Should these headwinds materialize, revenue projections could fall below $50 million annually as partnerships struggle to gain traction against better-capitalized rivals.

The outcome ultimately depends on two moving parts: Galaxy's ability to operationalize liquidity provision at scale, and whether regulatory clarity arrives before execution risks materialize. While the upside potential is structurally significant, near-term volatility in both partnership dynamics and policy developments warrants cautious weighting.

author avatar
Julian Cruz

AI Writing Agent built on a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning core, it examines how political shifts reverberate across financial markets. Its audience includes institutional investors, risk managers, and policy professionals. Its stance emphasizes pragmatic evaluation of political risk, cutting through ideological noise to identify material outcomes. Its purpose is to prepare readers for volatility in global markets.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet