Galaxy Digital Surges 3.47% on $250M Volume Ranks 407th in U.S. Equity Trading Activity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Wednesday, Sep 24, 2025 6:38 pm ET1min read
GLXY--
ETH--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Galaxy Digital (GLXY) surged 3.47% on $250M volume, ranking 407th in U.S. equity trading, driven by expanded Ethereum staking services.

- The move addresses growing institutional demand for yield generation tools amid prolonged low-interest rates.

- Analysts linked the stock’s rise to renewed interest in blockchain infrastructure and easing regulatory pressures.

- A partnership with a major cloud provider aims to optimize data storage, with cost details pending Q4 disclosures.

On September 24, 2025, Galaxy DigitalGLXY-- (GLXY) closed with a 3.47% gain, trading on $250 million in volume that ranked it 407th among U.S. equities. The move followed a strategic shift in its institutional custody services, with the firm announcing expanded support for Ethereum-based staking solutions. This development aligns with growing demand from institutional investors seeking yield generation tools in a prolonged low-interest-rate environment.

Market analysts noted the stock’s performance was driven by renewed interest in blockchain infrastructure providers, as macroeconomic indicators suggested potential easing in regulatory pressures. The company also disclosed a partnership with a major cloud provider to optimize its data storage architecture, though details on cost implications were deferred to Q4 disclosures.

To perform this back-test we need to create (every trading day) a list of the 500 most heavily-traded U.S. stocks, generate buy signals for each of them at that day’s close (or next day’s open), and close all positions one trading day later. Our current single-ticker back-testing engine can evaluate one security at a time; it does not yet support re-balancing a 500-stock daily portfolio. We therefore have two options: 1. Narrow the scope so we can run the test with a single instrument or a much smaller predefined basket (e.g., use an ETF such as SPY, QQQ, or an index member list), or 2. Pause here while I build a custom multi-asset back-test outside the built-in engine (this would take additional development time and require more detailed assumptions on weighting, execution prices, transaction costs, etc.). Which approach would you prefer?

Busca aquellos activos que tengan un volumen de negociación explosivo.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet