Ford's Stock Struggles at 167th in U.S. Dollar Volume as Battery Pact and Safety Review Weigh on Sentiment

On September 12, 2025, Ford Motor Co. , , . equities by dollar volume. The stock faced downward pressure amid mixed strategic developments and market dynamics.

A key factor influencing sentiment was Ford's recent partnership announcement with a European battery supplier to co-develop next-generation lithium-ion cells. While the collaboration aims to secure long-term supply chain stability, analysts noted the agreement lacks immediate financial commitments, limiting its near-term market impact. Separately, the company reiterated 2025 production guidance for its BlueCruise autonomous driving platform, which failed to generate significant investor enthusiasm given the timeline's alignment with existing projections.

Regulatory developments also weighed on the stock. The U.S. Department of Transportation initiated a preliminary safety review of Ford's EV thermal management systems, prompting calls for additional data submission. Though the probe is non-punitive, it introduces operational uncertainty during a critical product launch period. Concurrently, Ford's shareholder letter emphasized cost-cutting measures in its global manufacturing network, .

To run this back-test accurately we need to clarify a couple of practical details: 1. Universe definition • Do you want the top-500 by dollar volume across the entire U.S. equity market each day, or do you have a narrower universe (e.g., S&P 500 constituents, Nasdaq-100, etc.)? • Should ETFs be excluded? 2. Weighting method • Equal-weight each of the 500 names for that one-day holding period? • Or weight them by their trading volume share? 3. Data scope • Our current back-test engine runs on one ticker at a time; to replicate a 500-stock daily-rebalanced portfolio we would need to aggregate results across many tickers. • I can approximate the idea by back-testing a representative high-liquidity index (e.g., the S&P 500 ETF “SPY”) or by exporting daily signals for the individual stocks and computing the aggregate return externally. Which approach would you prefer?