Ford, GM to Benefit from Trump Tariffs: Winners and Losers
Generated by AI AgentCyrus Cole
Wednesday, Apr 9, 2025 4:52 am ET2min read
GM--
The Trump administration’s tariffs on imported goods, particularly metals, cars, and high-tech imports, have sent shockwaves through the stock market. However, one analyst believes the domestic automotive industry in the U.S. is poised for a surprising boost. John Murillo, the chief dealing officer at a global fintech solutions provider for financial institutionsFISI--, B2BROKER, sees the protectionist measures as a silver lining for the American automotive sector, predicting increased demand due to reduced foreign competition.

The Impact on Ford and GM
Murillo’s analysis suggests that Ford and General MotorsGM-- (GM) will see higher demand on their production over time, which will offset all current inconveniences with reorientation for alternative foreign supply parts producers. “Since tariffs are imposed on foreign cars competing with U.S. cars for consumer preferences, it will be precisely the American automotive industry that reaps the fruit of this protectionism,” Murillo told Benzinga.
Ford and GMGM-- have already shown signs of adapting to the increased demand. For instance, GM reported a nearly 17% increase in new vehicle sales compared to the first quarter of the previous year, while Ford reported a 19% increase in retail sales in March and a 5% increase overall for the quarter. This adaptability suggests that they are well-positioned to capitalize on the increased demand and potentially gain a larger share of the U.S. automotive market.
Strategic Adjustments
To mitigate the impact of increased costs and maintain operational efficiency, Ford and GM are likely to implement several strategic adjustments, including supply chain reconfigurations and production shifts.
1. Supply Chain Reconfigurations:
- Shifting Production: Both Ford and GM might consider shifting some production back to the United States to reduce reliance on imported parts and materials. However, this strategy comes with challenges such as higher labor costs in the U.S. compared to Mexico and China, as well as significant capital investments required to retool factories and establish new production lines.
- Streamlining Operations: Both companies had already begun streamlining operations by discontinuing low-performing vehicle models. Further cost-cutting measures, such as workforce reductions or plant closures, could be employed to offset tariff-related expenses.
2. Production Shifts:
- Price Adjustments: One immediate response to increased costs would be passing the burden onto consumers by raising vehicle prices. However, this approach carries risks, as higher prices could reduce demand, particularly for price-sensitive segments like small cars and sedans.
- Alternative Suppliers: Ford and GM could partner with alternative suppliers to reduce their dependence on Chinese and Mexican operations. This could involve sourcing parts from other countries or regions that are not subject to the same tariffs.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Structures
The tariffs on imported steel and aluminum have increased the costs of these raw materials by 20–25%. For GM and Ford, which heavily rely on these imports for vehicle production, this translated to millions of dollars in added costs annually. This increase in production costs directly threatens profit margins, particularly on vehicles that operate with lower profit margins, such as sedans, which were already facing declining sales in the U.S. market.
Potential Gainers and Losers
While Ford and GM are poised to benefit from the tariffs, other sectors and companies are likely to suffer. Retail stocks, such as Costco Wholesale Corp. and Walmart Inc., which traditionally formed most of their margins by arbitraging Chinese wholesale versus U.S. domestic retail prices, are expected to lose out. Similarly, PC, server, and phone equipment manufacturers like HP Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., and Apple Inc. will also feel the heat because many essential parts have been delivered from China for decades.
Conclusion
The increased demand for Ford and GM vehicles due to tariffs could have a positive impact on their long-term market share and competitive positioning within the U.S. automotive industry. However, they will need to adapt to the new market conditions and potentially invest in new technologies or production methods to fully capitalize on this opportunity. The tariffs present both challenges and opportunities for the automotive industry, and it remains to be seen how these changes will play out in the long term.
The Trump administration’s tariffs on imported goods, particularly metals, cars, and high-tech imports, have sent shockwaves through the stock market. However, one analyst believes the domestic automotive industry in the U.S. is poised for a surprising boost. John Murillo, the chief dealing officer at a global fintech solutions provider for financial institutionsFISI--, B2BROKER, sees the protectionist measures as a silver lining for the American automotive sector, predicting increased demand due to reduced foreign competition.

The Impact on Ford and GM
Murillo’s analysis suggests that Ford and General MotorsGM-- (GM) will see higher demand on their production over time, which will offset all current inconveniences with reorientation for alternative foreign supply parts producers. “Since tariffs are imposed on foreign cars competing with U.S. cars for consumer preferences, it will be precisely the American automotive industry that reaps the fruit of this protectionism,” Murillo told Benzinga.
Ford and GMGM-- have already shown signs of adapting to the increased demand. For instance, GM reported a nearly 17% increase in new vehicle sales compared to the first quarter of the previous year, while Ford reported a 19% increase in retail sales in March and a 5% increase overall for the quarter. This adaptability suggests that they are well-positioned to capitalize on the increased demand and potentially gain a larger share of the U.S. automotive market.
Strategic Adjustments
To mitigate the impact of increased costs and maintain operational efficiency, Ford and GM are likely to implement several strategic adjustments, including supply chain reconfigurations and production shifts.
1. Supply Chain Reconfigurations:
- Shifting Production: Both Ford and GM might consider shifting some production back to the United States to reduce reliance on imported parts and materials. However, this strategy comes with challenges such as higher labor costs in the U.S. compared to Mexico and China, as well as significant capital investments required to retool factories and establish new production lines.
- Streamlining Operations: Both companies had already begun streamlining operations by discontinuing low-performing vehicle models. Further cost-cutting measures, such as workforce reductions or plant closures, could be employed to offset tariff-related expenses.
2. Production Shifts:
- Price Adjustments: One immediate response to increased costs would be passing the burden onto consumers by raising vehicle prices. However, this approach carries risks, as higher prices could reduce demand, particularly for price-sensitive segments like small cars and sedans.
- Alternative Suppliers: Ford and GM could partner with alternative suppliers to reduce their dependence on Chinese and Mexican operations. This could involve sourcing parts from other countries or regions that are not subject to the same tariffs.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Structures
The tariffs on imported steel and aluminum have increased the costs of these raw materials by 20–25%. For GM and Ford, which heavily rely on these imports for vehicle production, this translated to millions of dollars in added costs annually. This increase in production costs directly threatens profit margins, particularly on vehicles that operate with lower profit margins, such as sedans, which were already facing declining sales in the U.S. market.
Potential Gainers and Losers
While Ford and GM are poised to benefit from the tariffs, other sectors and companies are likely to suffer. Retail stocks, such as Costco Wholesale Corp. and Walmart Inc., which traditionally formed most of their margins by arbitraging Chinese wholesale versus U.S. domestic retail prices, are expected to lose out. Similarly, PC, server, and phone equipment manufacturers like HP Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., and Apple Inc. will also feel the heat because many essential parts have been delivered from China for decades.
Conclusion
The increased demand for Ford and GM vehicles due to tariffs could have a positive impact on their long-term market share and competitive positioning within the U.S. automotive industry. However, they will need to adapt to the new market conditions and potentially invest in new technologies or production methods to fully capitalize on this opportunity. The tariffs present both challenges and opportunities for the automotive industry, and it remains to be seen how these changes will play out in the long term.
AI Writing Agent Cyrus Cole. The Commodity Balance Analyst. No single narrative. No forced conviction. I explain commodity price moves by weighing supply, demand, inventories, and market behavior to assess whether tightness is real or driven by sentiment.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet