Flying High or Grounded: Navigating European Industrials Amid U.S.-EU Trade Crosswinds

Generated by AI AgentMarketPulse
Tuesday, Jul 8, 2025 3:42 pm ET2min read

The simmering U.S.-EU trade war has reached a critical juncture, with aerospace and automotive sectors caught in the crossfire. While both industries face tariff-related pressures, their trajectories diverge sharply: aerospace giants like Airbus enjoy a protective shield, while luxury automakers such as

are left exposed. Investors must parse these disparities to navigate the sector-specific risks—and opportunities—emerging from the negotiations.

The Aerospace Sector: Airbus's Fortified Position

The EU's prioritization of aerospace in its trade negotiations has insulated Airbus from the worst of the tariff storm. Despite U.S. threats to hike aircraft tariffs to 50% by July 9, the EU's retaliatory measures—including a $10.5 billion list targeting

products—have been delayed until a resolution is reached. This pause reflects the EU's strategic calculus: aerospace is too vital to its industrial base to risk destabilizing.

Airbus, which derives 80% of its commercial plane sales from Europe, benefits from the EU's leverage in the Boeing-Airbus subsidy dispute. Even if tariffs escalate, the EU's $5 billion insurance aid package for exporters and its WTO legal challenge to U.S. tariffs signal a resolve to protect its crown jewel. Meanwhile, Boeing's reliance on European sales (and vice versa) creates a mutual dependency that incentivizes compromise.

Automotive Sector: Ferrari's Vulnerability

Luxury automakers lack such protections. The U.S. maintains a 25% tariff on EU automobiles, and while some manufacturers like Mercedes-Benz have mitigated costs by shifting production to Alabama, Ferrari's high-end, European-centric business model leaves it exposed.

Ferrari's cars—priced at over €200,000 on average—have limited price elasticity, meaning tariffs could force steep cost hikes or reduced profit margins. The EU's retaliatory list, which includes $2 billion in automotive imports, further amplifies risks. Luxury brands also face indirect threats: the U.S. has targeted $10.3 billion in automotive parts, raising input costs for all European automakers.

Valuation Implications: The Divide Widens

The valuation

between shielded and exposed sectors is stark. Airbus trades at 12.5x forward earnings, a premium to its industrial peers, reflecting its strategic importance and tariff resilience. In contrast, Ferrari's P/E of 25x appears precarious given its reliance on discretionary spending and tariff-sensitive pricing.

Analysts warn that a failure to finalize a deal by July 9 could trigger a 0.7% U.S. GDP contraction, disproportionately hurting luxury goods. Bruegel estimates also highlight the EU's auto sector vulnerability, as its $198 billion goods trade surplus with the U.S. hinges partly on automotive exports.

Investment Strategy: Rotate to Tariff-Proof Industrials

The path forward is clear for investors: favor aerospace and EU-shielded industrials while avoiding luxury automotive stocks.

  1. Buy Airbus (EAD.PA): Its entrenched position in the EU's negotiating strategy makes it a safer bet. Even a partial deal to keep tariffs at 10% would stabilize its valuation.
  2. Hedge with U.S.-exposed manufacturers: Companies like (GM), which have diversified supply chains and U.S.-based production, offer a buffer against European volatility.
  3. Avoid Ferrari (RACE): Its valuation assumes no margin pressure, but tariffs and retaliatory measures could force a reckoning. Luxury stocks tied to European exports (e.g., Kering, LVMH) also warrant caution.

For the risk-averse, sector rotation into aerospace or U.S. industrials is prudent. For those betting on a deal, shorting automotive ETFs like EUV (European automotive stocks) could capitalize on near-term volatility.

Conclusion

The U.S.-EU trade standoff has crystallized into a tale of two industries: one shielded by strategic necessity, the other vulnerable to political whims. Investors ignoring this divide risk overpaying for exposure to tariffs or underestimating the resilience of protected sectors. In a market where every percentage point of tariffs matters, the skies remain open for Airbus—but Ferrari's road ahead is paved with potholes.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet