FedEx's $0.47 Billion Volume Ranks 242nd Amid Sector Downturn Outperforming UPS in YTD Losses

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Sep 8, 2025 8:07 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- FedEx shares fell 1.19% on 2025/9/8 with $0.47B volume, ranking 242nd in market activity amid sector-wide declines.

- FedEx outperformed UPS (-19.1% YTD vs. -32.6%) as UPS reported 18.3% revenue drop, $3.5B cost cuts, and 20,000 layoffs.

- Analysts highlight macroeconomic risks (tariffs, weak demand) affecting logistics firms, but maintain "Moderate Buy" on FedEx with 22.8% upside potential.

On September 8, 2025, , ranking 242nd in market activity. The decline followed broader sector pressures and mixed guidance from key industry players.

FedEx has outperformed its major logistics rival

in the long term, . UPS recently reported weaker-than-expected earnings, citing margin pressures, declining volumes in domestic and international segments, . , . Analysts attribute UPS’s underperformance to macroeconomic headwinds, including tariffs and soft consumer demand, which could indirectly impact FedEx’s operations.

The logistics sector remains vulnerable to global trade uncertainties, with both companies facing challenges in balancing capital expenditures and profitability. FedEx’s recent performance suggests resilience relative to peers, . Analysts covering

maintain a “Moderate Buy” rating, .

To run this back-test rigorously I need to pin down a few implementation details and confirm the scope, because the engine we invoke has to know exactly how to turn your trading rule into day-by-day buy/sell instructions. Market universe: Do you want the entire U.S. listed equity universe (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX), or a narrower list (e.g., S&P 1500 constituents)? Ranking metric: “Daily trading volume” — confirm this is share volume (not dollar turnover). Trade timing: Typical approach is to rank yesterday’s volume after the close, buy the 500 names at the next day’s open, and exit those positions at that day’s close (1-day holding period). Is that the schedule you have in mind? Weighting & capital: Equal-weight each stock? Frictions: Commission / fees assumptions (e.g., ? Slippage model (if any). Practical note on tooling: Our built-in back-test engine is single-instrument, so to replicate a 500-stock basket we need to generate and aggregate 500 sets of trade P&Ls each day. That’s feasible but requires the confirmations above so I can script the correct data pulls and computations. Once I have these points confirmed I can prepare the data-retrieval plan, pull the required volume and price series, and feed the aggregated daily P&Ls into the performance engine for the overall strategy return curve.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet