AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox



The Federal Reserve maintained its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 4.25%-4.50% during its May 2025 meeting, marking the third consecutive decision to hold rates steady amid ongoing inflationary pressures and fiscal constraints. Chair Jerome Powell emphasized a cautious approach, stating, "Now is not the time for us to lead with a rate cut" [1]. The central bank cited persistent disinflation challenges, with both PCE and CPI metrics remaining above the 2% target, while its fiscal position has deteriorated due to declining remittances to the Treasury. A potential 25-30 basis point cut in 2025 could reduce annual income by $20 billion, further straining policy independence [1].
The Fed's decision reflects a dual bind: balancing the need to curb inflation against the risks of tightening too aggressively in a slowing labor market. While markets had priced in three rate cuts for 2025, the central bank adopted a "data-driven, delayed transition" strategy, prioritizing inflation control over preemptive easing [1]. This stance contrasts with market expectations, as the Fed's fiscal constraints-linked to its shrinking balance sheet-limit its ability to respond to economic shocks without compromising its long-term credibility [1].
In September 2025, the Fed finally implemented a 25-basis-point rate cut, lowering the benchmark rate to 4.00%-4.25%. The move, widely anticipated, followed a 11-to-1 vote, with Governor Stephen Miran dissenting in favor of a larger 50-basis-point reduction [3]. The decision was framed as a response to "moderated" economic activity and "elevated" inflation, with Powell describing the cut as "risk management" rather than a stimulus measure [3]. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) also signaled two additional cuts by year-end, reflecting growing concerns over labor market softness and inflationary pressures.
Morgan Stanley analysts highlighted long-term risks to the Fed's independence, warning that political pressures could distort monetary policy. Gold's 8% surge following the September rate cut underscored investor hedging against potential politicization of Fed decisions, particularly under the Trump administration [2]. The firm noted that overly accommodative policies, driven by political expediency, risk fueling inflation, weakening the dollar, and distorting capital allocation. Morgan Stanley advised investors to shift toward quality large-cap stocks and real assets while reducing exposure to speculative tech and small-cap equities [2].
The Fed's actions have had mixed market effects.
initially rebounded to $99,000 on the September rate cut, but derivatives data indicated low conviction in the rally, with gamma exposures clustered around the $95,000–$100,000 range [1]. If inflation remains sticky or unemployment rises, the Fed may delay further cuts, potentially capping BTC's upside. Conversely, a cooling labor market could prompt a dovish pivot, reigniting bullish momentum [1].Looking ahead, the Fed faces a delicate balancing act. While short-term cuts aim to mitigate risks to employment and growth, prolonged policy delays risk embedding inflationary expectations. Morgan Stanley's analysis underscores the importance of maintaining the Fed's independence to preserve the dollar's global reserve status and market credibility [2]. As the central bank navigates political pressures and economic uncertainties, its ability to act autonomously will remain critical to long-term financial stability.
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet