Fed Prioritizes Taming Inflation Over Economic Stimulus Push

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byShunan Liu
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2025 12:53 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- The Boston Fed urges delaying rate cuts until inflation nears 2% target, citing risks of premature easing in a still-inflationary environment.

- Atlanta Fed's Bostic emphasizes inflation as the "clearer and more urgent risk" over labor market signals, reflecting hawkish policy divisions.

- Fed officials consider resuming asset purchases post-October rate cut to maintain liquidity while avoiding inflationary spikes from tariffs.

- Policy balancing act emerges: rate cuts could stimulate growth but risk reigniting inflation, with "inflation monster" fears of entrenched price pressures.

- Uncertainty persists as Bostic's retirement and political push for cuts clash with caution from hawkish officials prioritizing inflation control.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has signaled a cautious approach to rate cuts, emphasizing the risks of premature action in a still-inflationary environment. In a statement released this week, the Boston Fed reiterated its preference to maintain the federal funds rate at current levels until there is "clear evidence" that inflation is trending toward the central bank's 2% target, citing a

. This stance aligns with broader concerns among policymakers about the potential for renewed inflationary pressures, a theme echoed by Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, who is set to retire in February, according to a .

Bostic, a key figure in the Fed's hawkish camp, has consistently argued that inflation remains the "clearer and more urgent risk" compared to the ambiguous signals from the labor market, as reported in a

. His comments underscore a divide within the Fed, where some officials advocate for patience amid stubbornly high price pressures, even as others push for rate cuts to bolster a slowing economy. The Boston Fed's recent remarks suggest it shares this cautious outlook, noting that while tariffs have not triggered a sharp inflation spike, they have "indeed played a role in propping up prices," according to the .

The central bank's balance sheet strategy also reflects this prudence. Following the October rate cut, Fed officials have signaled a potential return to asset purchases to maintain liquidity as economic demand grows, as noted in a

. James Bullard, St. Louis Fed President, highlighted the need for "gradual purchases of assets" to ensure ample reserves, a move that would mark a reversal from the quantitative tightening (QT) efforts that reduced the Fed's balance sheet from $9 trillion to $6.6 trillion since 2022, according to the Reuters report. Such measures aim to stabilize short-term funding markets while avoiding excessive inflationary risks.

The interplay between these policies highlights the Fed's delicate balancing act. While rate cuts could stimulate growth, they risk reigniting inflation, a concern encapsulated in the Boston Fed's warning about the "inflation monster." This term, often used by policymakers, reflects fears of a self-perpetuating cycle where price increases become entrenched, requiring aggressive policy responses down the line, as described in the

.

As the Fed navigates these challenges, the path forward remains uncertain. With Bostic's retirement and the broader political push for rate cuts, the central bank faces pressure to act. Yet, as the Boston Fed and its hawkish peers caution, the risks of premature easing—particularly in a landscape where inflationary pressures persist—could outweigh the benefits.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet