Fed Policy Divergence and the Case for Growth Assets: Miran's Dovish Signals in a Hawkish Landscape

---

The Federal Reserve's monetary policy in 2025 has become a battleground of competing forces: the lingering grip of inflation versus the fragility of the labor market and escalating geopolitical risks. Amid this tension, Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran has emerged as a vocal advocate for aggressive rate cuts, challenging the broader hawkish consensus on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). His recent remarks signal a potential policy divergence that could reshape risk asset valuations, particularly for growth equities and long-duration assets.

Miran's Dovish Pivot: A Structural Argument

Miran's advocacy for rate cuts is rooted in a structural reevaluation of the U.S. economy. In a speech on October 15, 2025, he argued that the current federal funds rate of 4.00%-4.25% is "quite restrictive" and that an additional 1.25 percentage points in reductions are necessary to counteract the fallout from U.S.-China trade tensions and a softening labor market, as he said in his October 15 speech. Unlike traditional inflation-focused hawks, Miran emphasizes demographic and fiscal shifts-such as declining immigration and tax reforms-that have lowered the neutral rate, a concept he described as "a new normal," a point highlighted in a Yahoo profile. His stance reflects a broader recognition that the Fed's policy framework must adapt to structural changes rather than rely on historical benchmarks.

This dovish pivot is not without precedent. Miran's call for a mid-2% target rate aligns with the bond market's recent calm, which he interprets as a signal of waning inflationary pressures and growing demand for liquidity, a point he cited when noting the calm bond market. Notably, his remarks have been interpreted as bullish for cryptocurrencies, a sector that thrives on accommodative monetary policy.

Economic Indicators: A Tenuous Balance

The Fed's September 2025 FOMC meeting cut the federal funds rate by 25 basis points, bringing it to 4.00%-4.25%, according to the Fed's September FOMC projections. These adjustments reflect a fragile economic landscape: core PCE inflation remains at 2.9%, above the 2.0% target, while the unemployment rate has hovered between 4.0% and 4.3% since May 2024, with additional reporting that the Fed signals two more cuts. However, structural risks loom large.

The labor market, once a pillar of resilience, shows signs of strain. Private estimates suggest September 2025 job gains fell to 17,000 from 22,000 in August, and Goldman Sachs analysts note a "decade-low" ratio of job seekers to open positions, according to a Forbes analysis. Meanwhile, trade tensions with China have exacerbated inflation in specific sectors, with tariffs pushing up prices for consumer goods and dampening spending among lower-income households. Miran's emphasis on these factors highlights a policy dilemma: further tightening could deepen a slowdown, while delayed action risks embedding higher inflation into wage and price expectations.

Market Reactions: Growth Stocks and Long-Duration Assets Rally

The Fed's dovish signals have already ignited a surge in risk assets. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite hit record highs in October 2025, driven by optimism over rate cuts and the AI-driven momentum of growth-oriented companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. Lower borrowing costs have amplified valuations for high-growth firms, which rely on long-term cash flow projections-a dynamic that benefits from accommodative monetary policy.

Long-duration assets have also outperformed. Gold prices soared past $4,000 per ounce, reflecting its role as a hedge against both inflation and geopolitical uncertainty. The U.S. dollar weakened, making exports more competitive but also increasing the appeal of non-dollar assets. These trends suggest that markets are pricing in a more aggressive easing cycle than the Fed's official projections, a gap that could widen if Miran's faction gains influence.

Positioning for Policy Divergence

The case for positioning in growth equities and long-duration assets hinges on three pillars:
1. Anticipated Rate Cuts: With the Fed projecting two more 25-basis-point cuts by year-end, the discount rate for future cash flows will decline, boosting valuations for growth stocks.
2. Structural Tailwinds: Miran's focus on immigration and fiscal policy underscores a lower neutral rate, which could justify sustained low rates even as inflation moderates.
3. Safe-Haven Demand: Geopolitical risks and trade tensions will likely keep long-duration assets in favor, even as the Fed navigates its inflation mandate.

However, investors must remain cautious. Traditional banks and financial institutions could face margin compression in a low-rate environment, and persistent inflation-though easing-remains a risk. Yet, for those who accept Miran's thesis, the rewards of a dovish pivot outweigh the risks.

Conclusion

Stephen Miran's dovish stance represents more than a policy preference-it is a challenge to the Fed's traditional playbook in a world of structural change. As the FOMC grapples with the tension between inflation and growth, investors who position for a more aggressive easing cycle stand to benefit from a re-rating of risk assets. The coming months will test whether Miran's vision gains traction, but the market's current trajectory suggests that the era of hawkish restraint may already be waning.

---