FAA to Review 737 MAX Engine Issue After Bird Strike Incidents
Thursday, Nov 21, 2024 7:02 pm ET
2min read The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has announced its intention to convene a Corrective Action Review Board to examine the safety risks posed by engine issues on Boeing 737 MAX aircraft following two recent bird strike incidents. This move comes as the agency seeks to address the potential for smoke ingestion in the event of an engine hit by a bird, which could lead to safety risks for passengers and crew.
The FAA's decision to review the 737 MAX engine issue is a response to two serious incidents involving Southwest Airlines MAX aircraft. In March 2023, a bird strike on a flight taking off from Havana, Cuba, caused smoke to pour into the passenger cabin. Similarly, in December 2023, a bird strike on a flight departing from New Orleans resulted in smoke entering the cockpit. In both cases, the pilots safely made emergency landings, but the incidents highlighted the need for further review and potential changes to operating procedures.
The FAA is considering a temporary accommodation, such as an Airworthiness Directive, to require pilots to take off with the air flow from the main engines into the aircraft's interior turned off. This measure aims to prevent smoke ingestion if one of the engines is hit by a bird. However, changing standard pilot takeoff procedures must be done carefully to avoid unintended consequences.
Boeing and engine-maker CFM International are expected to collaborate on developing a permanent fix for the 737 MAX engine issue. The FAA's assessment of the risks and potential solutions is ongoing, and the agency will consider various factors to ensure the safety of passengers and crew.
The FAA's review of the 737 MAX engine issue has significant implications for the certification of the MAX 7 and MAX 10 models. The proposed temporary fix could further delay the certification of these models until Boeing and CFM International develop a permanent solution. The FAA's action indicates unease about the current standard checklist's sufficiency in addressing the risk of smoke ingestion in case of an engine hit by a bird.
As the FAA convenes the Corrective Action Review Board, it will be crucial for the agency to assess the potential operational impacts of temporarily turning off bleed air during takeoff. While this measure could mitigate the risk of smoke ingestion, it may also impact passenger comfort and cabin altitude. The FAA must carefully weigh these trade-offs and ensure that any temporary measure does not introduce new risks, such as increased pilot workload during a critical phase of flight.
In conclusion, the FAA's decision to review the 737 MAX engine issue is a proactive step towards ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. As the agency works to address the potential risks posed by engine issues, it is essential for Boeing and CFM International to collaborate on developing a permanent fix. The FAA's assessment of the risks and potential solutions will have significant implications for the certification of the MAX 7 and MAX 10 models, as well as the broader aviation industry.
The FAA's decision to review the 737 MAX engine issue is a response to two serious incidents involving Southwest Airlines MAX aircraft. In March 2023, a bird strike on a flight taking off from Havana, Cuba, caused smoke to pour into the passenger cabin. Similarly, in December 2023, a bird strike on a flight departing from New Orleans resulted in smoke entering the cockpit. In both cases, the pilots safely made emergency landings, but the incidents highlighted the need for further review and potential changes to operating procedures.
The FAA is considering a temporary accommodation, such as an Airworthiness Directive, to require pilots to take off with the air flow from the main engines into the aircraft's interior turned off. This measure aims to prevent smoke ingestion if one of the engines is hit by a bird. However, changing standard pilot takeoff procedures must be done carefully to avoid unintended consequences.
Boeing and engine-maker CFM International are expected to collaborate on developing a permanent fix for the 737 MAX engine issue. The FAA's assessment of the risks and potential solutions is ongoing, and the agency will consider various factors to ensure the safety of passengers and crew.
The FAA's review of the 737 MAX engine issue has significant implications for the certification of the MAX 7 and MAX 10 models. The proposed temporary fix could further delay the certification of these models until Boeing and CFM International develop a permanent solution. The FAA's action indicates unease about the current standard checklist's sufficiency in addressing the risk of smoke ingestion in case of an engine hit by a bird.
As the FAA convenes the Corrective Action Review Board, it will be crucial for the agency to assess the potential operational impacts of temporarily turning off bleed air during takeoff. While this measure could mitigate the risk of smoke ingestion, it may also impact passenger comfort and cabin altitude. The FAA must carefully weigh these trade-offs and ensure that any temporary measure does not introduce new risks, such as increased pilot workload during a critical phase of flight.
In conclusion, the FAA's decision to review the 737 MAX engine issue is a proactive step towards ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. As the agency works to address the potential risks posed by engine issues, it is essential for Boeing and CFM International to collaborate on developing a permanent fix. The FAA's assessment of the risks and potential solutions will have significant implications for the certification of the MAX 7 and MAX 10 models, as well as the broader aviation industry.
Disclaimer: the above is a summary showing certain market information. AInvest is not responsible for any data errors, omissions or other information that may be displayed incorrectly as the data is derived from a third party source. Communications displaying market prices, data and other information available in this post are meant for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Please do your own research when investing. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security, or financial product does not guarantee future results or returns. Keep in mind that while diversification may help spread risk, it does not assure a profit, or protect against loss in a down market.