Ex-JPMorgan Trader Accused of Spoofing Says He Was Wrongly Fired

Wesley ParkWednesday, Dec 11, 2024 4:45 am ET
1min read


In a surprising turn of events, an ex-JPMorgan trader accused of spoofing and market manipulation has claimed that he was wrongly fired from the bank. Gregg Smith, the former head of global precious metals business at JPMorgan, was sentenced to two years in prison and a $50,000 fine in December 2022 for his role in the scheme. However, Smith maintains that he was unfairly dismissed and that his concerns about the bank's trading practices led to his termination.

Smith's allegations raise questions about JPMorgan's internal controls and the potential for misconduct within the bank. The trader claims that he was retaliated against for reporting suspicious activity, which he believes ultimately led to his dismissal. Smith argues that his successful track record and top performance on the precious metals desk should have protected him from termination. He also contends that the bank's internal investigation was flawed and biased, relying on incomplete and inaccurate information.

The CFTC's definition of spoofing and market manipulation applies to this case, as Smith is accused of placing orders without intending to execute them, aiming to manipulate market prices. This aligns with the CFTC's definition of spoofing, which is "bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution." Internal compliance policies and procedures at JPMorgan played a significant role in the bank's liability in the spoofing case. The CFTC order found that JPMorgan's subsidiary, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), failed to provide adequate supervision to its employees, enabling the misconduct to continue.

Smith's claims of wrongful termination could potentially tarnish JPMorgan's reputation and erode investor confidence, especially given the bank's recent $920.2 million settlement for spoofing and market manipulation. However, JPMorgan's robust compliance efforts since 2015, including hiring hundreds of new compliance officers and increasing internal audit budgets, may mitigate this impact.

In conclusion, the ex-JPMorgan trader's claims of wrongful termination raise important questions about the bank's internal controls and the potential for misconduct. While Smith's allegations may impact JPMorgan's reputation and investor confidence, the bank's robust compliance efforts since 2015 could help mitigate any negative effects. The CFTC's definition of spoofing and market manipulation applies to this case, and internal compliance policies and procedures played a significant role in JPMorgan's liability.