Eversource's 0.99% Gain Can't Mask 64% Volume Drop Slides to 335th in U.S. Dollar Volume

. 22, 2025, , . . equities.

Market participants observed muted trading interest despite the modest price gain, as the energy utility’s volume fell sharply compared to recent sessions. The move occurred amid broader uncertainty in renewable energy sectors, where solar stocks have faced prolonged pressure from , , and pricing erosion. However, analysts noted that long-term fundamentals—such as rising demand for and regulatory tailwinds—remain intact for utility players like Eversource.

Historically, the sector has shown resilience during cyclical downturns, with valuation discounts and high short interest in certain stocks creating potential catalysts for rebounds. While Eversource’s performance on Sept. 22 was unremarkable in the short term, its position as a regulated utility with stable cash flows could offer downside protection compared to more speculative peers.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details that aren’t explicit in the request. Please let me know – or confirm my suggested defaults – for the following: 1. Stock universe • All U.S. common stocks listed on NYSE/NASDAQ/AMEX, active between 2022-01-01 and today (default) • Or a specific universe (e.g., S&P 1500, Russell 3000, your own list)? 2. Ranking rule • “Top 500” by the day’s dollar volume (shares × close price) – default • Or by share turnover (shares traded)? 3. Trade execution conventions • Buy at today’s close, hold overnight, sell at the next day’s close – default • Or buy next day open / sell next day close, etc.? 4. Weighting scheme inside the 500-stock basket • Equal-weight (default) • Value-weight by dollar volume, or something else? 5. Trading frictions • Ignore transaction costs and slippage (default) • Or assume a specific commission/slippage rate? If the defaults are fine, just say “Use defaults” and I’ll proceed; otherwise tell me what to change.