Evaluating Crypto Exchange Security Amid South Korea's Voice Phishing Crisis

Generated by AI AgentAnders MiroReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Jan 7, 2026 3:51 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- South Korea's crypto sector faces a 660% surge in AI-powered voice phishing attacks, causing $718M in losses by October 2025.

- Regulators propose 10% penalty caps on stolen funds and launched AI-based ASAP platform to combat deepfake fraud.

- Exchanges adopt biometric verification and MFA but struggle with compliance gaps as $2.02B in crypto theft persists.

- Upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act aims to enforce strict liability, balancing innovation risks with user protection demands.

South Korea's cryptocurrency sector has become a battleground for innovation and security, with voice phishing attacks surging by 660% in the first seven months of 2025 compared to 2024. These scams, leveraging AI voice cloning and deepfake video, have targeted users of major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb, resulting in

in the first 10 months of 2025 alone. For investors, the question is no longer whether crypto exchanges can be hacked but how prepared they are to mitigate risks in a regulatory environment tightening its grip.

The Surge in Voice Phishing: A New Frontier of Fraud

Voice phishing attacks in South Korea have evolved from simple impersonation to sophisticated AI-driven schemes. Scammers now mimic authorities, family members, or exchange support staff to extract private keys, seed phrases, or prompt urgent fund transfers.

by the Korean Financial Crime Prevention Association (KFCPA) revealed that losses from these attacks reached KRW 6.4 trillion ($4.9 billion) in the first half of the year, a 98% increase from 2024. The rise of AI voice cloning has made these scams harder to detect, with involving a fugitive who defrauded 1,300 individuals of ₩17.7 billion ($13.2 million) between 2018 and 2019.

Regulatory Responses: Fines, AI, and the Push for Accountability

South Korea's regulators are responding with a dual approach: stricter penalties for exchanges and AI-driven countermeasures. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) has proposed fines of up to 10% of stolen funds for hacked exchanges, a drastic increase from the current $456,000 cap. For example,

in late 2024 would have incurred a $3.6 million fine under this proposal. A competing proposal ties penalties to 3% of an exchange's annual revenue, which could mean a , given its $1.2 billion 2024 revenue.

To combat AI-powered fraud, the Financial Security Institute (FSI) launched the AI-based Anti-Phishing Sharing & Analysis Platform (ASAP), enabling real-time information sharing among financial institutions, telecom providers, and law enforcement.

to detect and block fraudulent calls, deepfake videos, and malicious apps. However, , as 26% of South Korean adults reported falling victim to voice phishing in 2025.

Risk Mitigation Strategies: MFA, Biometrics, and the Limits of Compliance

South Korean exchanges are adopting multi-factor authentication (MFA) and biometric verification to bolster security.

to integrate biometric onboarding, reducing unauthorized access risks. Despite these measures, , often through sophisticated impersonation tactics and embedded IT workers.

Regulatory alignment remains a challenge. While the FSC pushes for standards comparable to traditional finance, exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb face scrutiny for anti-money laundering (AML) violations.

for AML lapses, and Bithumb is under investigation for similar issues. These penalties highlight the gap between proposed regulations and operational readiness.

The Path Forward: Balancing Innovation and Security

South Korea's regulatory framework is evolving rapidly, with the Digital Asset Basic Act (delayed to 2026) aiming to enforce strict liability for hacking losses and mandate user reimbursement. However, the proposed 10% fine or revenue-based penalties may incentivize exchanges to prioritize compliance over innovation. For instance,

could deter exchanges from experimenting with new technologies like won-backed stablecoins, which the government is promoting to boost crypto competitiveness.

Investors must weigh these dynamics. Exchanges that integrate AI-driven fraud detection, robust MFA, and proactive user education-such as Upbit's biometric partnerships-will likely outperform peers. Conversely, platforms lagging in compliance or over-reliant on outdated security measures face existential risks, particularly as regulators close the gap between crypto and traditional finance standards.

Conclusion

South Korea's voice phishing crisis underscores the urgent need for a layered defense strategy in crypto exchanges. While regulatory fines and AI tools like ASAP are critical, long-term success depends on aligning innovation with accountability. For investors, the key is to identify platforms that not only comply with emerging rules but also invest in cutting-edge security and user awareness. In a market where

fled to foreign exchanges in 2025 due to restrictive policies, the winners will be those who balance regulatory readiness with technological agility.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet