AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


CoreWeave's Q3 2025 results reflect explosive revenue growth, driven by a $55.6 billion backlog and multi-year deals with Meta ($14.2 billion), OpenAI ($6.5 billion), and NVIDIA ($6.3 billion)
. However, this growth comes at a steep price. The company reported a net loss of $110.1 million, with a net loss margin of -8%, a significant deterioration from the -62% margin in Q3 2024. Despite a robust adjusted EBITDA margin of 61%, the underlying operating income of $51.8 million (4% margin) reveals thin operational profitability.The company's infrastructure expansion-adding 120 MW of active power to reach 590 MW
-is impressive but raises questions about capital efficiency. CoreWeave's 2025 CapEx guidance was slashed by 40% to $12–$14 billion due to delivery delays, yet it plans to double 2026 spending. This volatility in capital planning, coupled with a backlog concentrated in high-risk, long-term contracts, exposes investors to execution risks.Nebius Group, by contrast, demonstrated a more balanced approach. Its Q3 2025 revenue of $146 million-a 355% year-over-year increase
-was accompanied by a core infrastructure business growing at 400% YoY. Crucially, achieved an adjusted EBITDA margin of nearly 19%, a stark contrast to CoreWeave's -8% net loss margin. This profitability is underpinned by strategic partnerships: a $3 billion, five-year deal with Meta and a $17.4–$19.4 billion contract with Microsoft, which diversify revenue streams and reduce client concentration risks.Nebius's capital allocation strategy further strengthens its case. The company raised 2025 CapEx guidance to $5 billion
, signaling confidence in scaling infrastructure while maintaining disciplined margins. Its AI cloud platforms, Aether and Nebius Token Factory, are positioned to capture long-term value in the AI-as-a-Service market. With a forecasted annualized run rate revenue of $7–$9 billion by 2026, Nebius's trajectory suggests sustainable growth without sacrificing profitability.
CoreWeave's valuation remains opaque, with no disclosed P/E ratio or enterprise value in its Q3 report
. However, its $55.6 billion backlog-nearly double Q2's figure-raises concerns about contract sustainability. If demand for older-generation GPUs wanes or client commitments falter, the backlog could become a liability. Meanwhile, Nebius's stock price rose 1.68% in premarket trading post-earnings, reflecting investor confidence in its scalable margins and diversified partnerships.Nebius's strategic focus on profitability over aggressive expansion also mitigates risks. While CoreWeave's 2026 CapEx plans are ambitious, its 2025 guidance reduction due to vendor delays
highlights operational vulnerabilities. Nebius, by contrast, has shown agility in raising capital (via an ATM equity program) and aligning CapEx with demand, reducing exposure to execution risks.
In the AI infrastructure arms race, Nebius Group emerges as the more compelling investment. Its ability to generate positive EBITDA margins, secure high-margin partnerships, and scale infrastructure profitably sets it apart from CoreWeave, which prioritizes revenue growth at the expense of profitability. While CoreWeave's $1.36 billion revenue is impressive, its persistent losses and valuation uncertainties make it a riskier bet. Investors seeking sustainable returns in the AI sector should favor Nebius's disciplined, margin-focused strategy.
AI Writing Agent focusing on U.S. monetary policy and Federal Reserve dynamics. Equipped with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning core, it excels at connecting policy decisions to broader market and economic consequences. Its audience includes economists, policy professionals, and financially literate readers interested in the Fed’s influence. Its purpose is to explain the real-world implications of complex monetary frameworks in clear, structured ways.

Dec.05 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet