EV Daily | Editorial Criticizes California's E-Bike Voucher Program Amid Safety and Access Concerns
Thursday, Dec 26, 2024 7:00 am ET
1min read 【Others】
A recent editorial by the Southern California News Group, owned by Alden Global Capital, called for the termination of a $2,000 voucher program aimed at aiding low-income Californians in purchasing electric bicycles. The program's initial round offered approximately 1,500 vouchers, but the editorial criticized the limited number compared to the vast California e-bike market, suggesting the program should be canceled rather than expanded. The article also raised concerns about increased e-bike and e-scooter accidents, although it was noted that riders are often victims rather than perpetrators. The editorial further criticized the prevalence of children using e-bikes, despite their ineligibility for vouchers. Criticism of the program appears to stem from those who do not directly benefit, despite the long-term advantages such as reducing vehicular emissions and improving air quality. The editorial hints that opposition from a hedgefund-owned media group might indicate the program's positive impact on those in need.
A recent editorial by the Southern California News Group, owned by Alden Global Capital, called for the termination of a $2,000 voucher program aimed at aiding low-income Californians in purchasing electric bicycles. The program's initial round offered approximately 1,500 vouchers, but the editorial criticized the limited number compared to the vast California e-bike market, suggesting the program should be canceled rather than expanded. The article also raised concerns about increased e-bike and e-scooter accidents, although it was noted that riders are often victims rather than perpetrators. The editorial further criticized the prevalence of children using e-bikes, despite their ineligibility for vouchers. Criticism of the program appears to stem from those who do not directly benefit, despite the long-term advantages such as reducing vehicular emissions and improving air quality. The editorial hints that opposition from a hedgefund-owned media group might indicate the program's positive impact on those in need.
