EU delays AI Act as regulators weigh ethics against global competition

The European Union is reconsidering the timeline for implementing its landmark AI Act, with reports indicating potential delays to key provisions amid mounting pressure from U.S. authorities and major technology firms. The European Commission, which introduced the AI Act in April 2021 as the world's strictest regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, now faces calls to soften enforcement to avoid economic friction with the U.S. and ease compliance burdens for tech companies, according to a Cointelegraph report.

The proposed adjustments, part of a "simplification package" set for a final decision on November 19, include a one-year compliance grace period for generative AI providers and a postponement of fines for transparency rule violations until August 2027, as noted by the Cointelegraph report. The AI Act, which entered into force in August 2024, was designed to gradually roll out over the next six to 36 months, with high-risk AI systems—those posing significant threats to health, safety, or fundamental rights—scheduled for enforcement in August 2026, according to Yahoo Finance. The delay aims to grant companies additional time to adapt to the rules without disrupting market operations.

The shift reflects broader tensions between the EU's regulatory ambitions and the global AI landscape. U.S. President Donald Trump has warned of retaliatory measures, including cutting intelligence or weapon supplies to Ukraine, if the EU's rules are perceived as adversarial. This has prompted the EU to engage in informal discussions with the Trump administration to align the AI Act with transatlantic trade interests, the Cointelegraph report added. Meanwhile, tech giants like Meta have argued that stringent regulations risk isolating Europe from cutting-edge AI advancements, a concern amplified by the sector's rapid evolution.

The AI Act's original risk-based framework categorizes AI systems from "unacceptable" to "minimal" risk, imposing strict obligations on high-risk applications such as biometric surveillance and automated decision-making in critical sectors. Critics of the delayed enforcement argue that any rollback could undermine the EU's leadership in ethical AI governance, while supporters contend it preserves competitiveness in a global market dominated by U.S. and Chinese firms, the Cointelegraph report said.

Thomas Regnier, a European Commission official, acknowledged ongoing deliberations but emphasized that the AI Act remains a cornerstone of the bloc's digital strategy. "A reflection is still ongoing," he told Cointelegraph, adding that the simplification package will be presented on November 19. The proposal, however, requires approval from EU member states and the European Parliament, introducing uncertainty ahead of the deadline.

The EU's pivot highlights the challenges of balancing innovation with regulation in a rapidly evolving field. While the proposed grace period and delayed penalties aim to reduce compliance costs, they also signal a pragmatic approach to global tech dynamics. For now, the outcome of the November 19 vote will determine whether the AI Act retains its groundbreaking status or becomes a more flexible framework shaped by geopolitical and commercial pressures.

---