Ethereum's Strategic Funding Shift: How Wishlist and RFP Models Are Reshaping Ecosystem Sustainability and Developer Alignment for Long-Term Growth

Generated by AI AgentPenny McCormerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Nov 3, 2025 3:02 pm ET3min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Ethereum Foundation shifts to curated wishlist/RFP models to balance innovation with sustainability, prioritizing infrastructure and L1 scalability.

- Focus areas include ZK cryptography, interoperability (EIL/CCIP), and academic research, excluding DeFi products to avoid fragmentation and regulatory risks.

- Strategic funding indirectly boosts layer-2 solutions (Optimism/Arbitrum) and DeFi by improving scalability, gas efficiency, and cross-chain integration.

- Long-term goals reduce treasury spending to 5% by 2029, strengthen technical moats, and attract institutional investors through formal verification and security research.

Ethereum's evolving funding strategy is a masterclass in balancing innovation with sustainability. By pivoting from open grants to curated wishlist and Request for Proposal (RFP) models, the Foundation is recalibrating its approach to ecosystem development. This shift, driven by operational constraints and strategic priorities, aims to align developers with high-impact projects while ensuring long-term financial viability. For investors, this reorientation signals a pivotal moment in Ethereum's trajectory, particularly for layer-2 solutions and DeFi infrastructure.

The Wishlist and RFP Models: A New Era of Curated Innovation

The Ethereum Foundation has suspended its open grant applications under the Ecosystem Support Program (ESP) to adopt a more targeted approach, as detailed in a Bitget article (

). This change prioritizes infrastructure, interoperability, and layer-1 (L1) scalability, with specific focus areas like cryptography, the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL), and Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), a point also highlighted in the Bitget coverage. By narrowing its scope, the foundation addresses two critical challenges: the overwhelming volume of grant applications and the need to explore strategic opportunities that counter competition from blockchains like and , as the Bitget article explains.

The RFP model introduces a structured process for funding projects that align with Ethereum's long-term goals. For instance, the 2025 Academic Grants Round allocated up to $1.5 million to support research in areas such as cryptography, consensus protocols, and formal verification (

). This emphasis on academic rigor ensures that funded projects contribute foundational knowledge to the ecosystem, fostering innovation that transcends immediate commercial applications.

Developer Alignment and Academic Research: The Building Blocks of Sustainability

The foundation's wishlist model is designed to attract researchers and developers to high-leverage projects. For example, the 2025 Academic Grants Round explicitly encourages proposals in Economics & Game Theory, Theoretical Cryptography, and Consensus Design (the Academic Grants Round). By incentivizing academic exploration in these areas, Ethereum is laying the groundwork for breakthroughs in scalability and security. Projects like Pectra and Fusaka, which have already improved network efficiency, exemplify the potential of this approach, as noted in the Bitget coverage.

However, the foundation's focus on academic research comes with caveats. Financial products like stablecoins or lending platforms are excluded from eligibility (the Academic Grants Round), redirecting attention to infrastructure and tooling. This exclusion underscores a deliberate strategy to avoid funding projects that could fragment the ecosystem or introduce regulatory risks. Instead, the foundation channels resources into open-source tools and foundational research, ensuring that the ecosystem remains robust and adaptable.

Impact on Layer-2 and DeFi: Indirect but Profound

While the ESP does not directly fund DeFi projects, the foundation's strategic priorities indirectly bolster layer-2 solutions and DeFi infrastructure. For instance, layer-2 protocols like

, , and Base have thrived by addressing Ethereum's scalability limitations, as covered in a KuCoin guide (). Optimism's Retroactive Public Goods Funding model and Arbitrum's Stylus environment are innovations that align with the foundation's wishlist of interoperability and developer tooling, points also explored in the KuCoin guide. These projects benefit from the broader ecosystem's focus on scalability, even if they aren't explicitly funded by the ESP.

The foundation's emphasis on ZK cryptography and data availability (e.g., EigenDA) also supports layer-2 advancements. By reducing gas fees and improving cross-chain integration, these initiatives create a fertile ground for DeFi growth. For example, Base's hybrid rollup model has attracted DeFi projects by slashing transaction costs to under one cent, a trend discussed in the KuCoin piece. Such developments highlight how the foundation's funding strategy catalyzes innovation in adjacent sectors.

Long-Term Investment Implications

Ethereum's funding shift has significant implications for investors. First, the focus on sustainability-reducing annual treasury spending from 15% to 5% by 2029, as outlined in the Bitget coverage-ensures that resources are allocated to projects with lasting impact. This approach mitigates the risk of short-term speculative bubbles and positions Ethereum to compete with emerging blockchains.

Second, the alignment of developers with high-leverage projects like ZK cryptography and interoperability protocols strengthens Ethereum's technical moat. For layer-2 solutions, this means continued innovation in scalability and cost efficiency, which are critical for DeFi's mass adoption. Investors should monitor projects like Blast and Mantle, which leverage these advancements to capture market share, as highlighted in the KuCoin guide.

Finally, the foundation's academic grants foster a pipeline of research that could unlock new use cases, such as real-world asset tokenization. By prioritizing formal verification and security, Ethereum is addressing institutional investors' concerns about smart contract risks, paving the way for broader adoption.

Conclusion

Ethereum's transition to wishlist and RFP models is a calculated move to balance innovation with sustainability. By curating funding for high-impact projects and aligning developers with strategic priorities, the foundation is fortifying Ethereum's position as a leader in DeFi and layer-2 solutions. For investors, this strategy signals a long-term commitment to technical excellence and ecosystem resilience, making Ethereum's infrastructure projects a compelling bet for the next phase of blockchain growth.