Ethereum News Today: Roman Storm Trial Enters Critical Phase as Defense Reclassifies Tornado Cash as Privacy Tool

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Friday, Jul 25, 2025 3:05 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, faces U.S. charges for alleged sanctions violations and enabling financial crime via the privacy tool.

- Defense reclassifies Tornado Cash as a legitimate privacy mechanism, citing Ethereum developers and experts to counter prosecutors' claims of illicit use.

- Prosecutors argue Storm knowingly facilitated North Korean hacking groups' transactions, leveraging 2022 Treasury sanctions to justify criminal liability.

- The case sets a legal precedent for crypto liability, with Vitalik Buterin and $2.8M in community support highlighting tensions between privacy rights and regulation.

- A conviction could reinforce government control over DeFi, while an acquittal might validate privacy tools as essential to blockchain innovation.

The legal battle involving Roman Storm, co-founder of the decentralized privacy tool Tornado Cash, is entering a critical phase as the defense prepares to conclude its case. U.S. prosecutors have rested their arguments, with defense attorneys now focused on redefining the tool’s purpose and distancing its creator from allegations of enabling financial crime. Storm faces charges of money laundering, conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitter, and conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions. The trial, now in its 10th day, has drawn significant attention from the crypto community, with

co-founder Vitalik Buterin and other blockchain advocates contributing over $2.8 million to Storm’s legal fund [1].

Defense attorneys began their rebuttal on Thursday, calling Ethereum core developer Preston Van Loon as their first witness. Van Loon testified that Tornado Cash is a “privacy tool for Ethereum,” emphasizing its role in protecting users from cyber threats rather than facilitating illicit activity. He disclosed his personal use of the tool to send 43 ETH between 2019 and 2020, framing it as a standard precaution within the blockchain ecosystem [1]. The defense strategy appears to hinge on reclassifying Tornado Cash as a legitimate privacy mechanism, with plans to summon additional experts, including “two or three doctors” and a Chainalysis representative, to support this narrative [1].

Prosecutors, however, have argued that Storm’s design knowingly enabled financial crime, citing evidence that North Korean hacking groups exploited Tornado Cash for illicit transactions. They contend that the developer’s awareness of these risks and his role in promoting the platform justify the charges. The U.S. Treasury’s 2022 sanctions on Tornado Cash’s smart contract addresses are also central to the prosecution’s case, with officials asserting that the tool’s association with sanctioned entities justifies criminal liability [1]. The defense has requested revised jury instructions to clarify the platform’s intended purpose, but prosecutors have rejected this, maintaining that the sanctions were justified.

The case has broader implications for the crypto industry, raising questions about the legal liability of developers for tools designed to enhance privacy. This tension mirrors debates over decentralization and regulatory compliance, with precedents such as the 2024 conviction of Tornado Cash co-founder Alexey Pertsev in the Netherlands and the 25-year sentence of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried underscoring the government’s stance

creators accountable for real-world consequences [1]. Storm’s potential testimony remains uncertain; he previously stated he “may or may not” take the stand, leaving the jury without direct insight into his motivations [1].

Community reactions have been vocal, with

user NoSkidMarks defending the case on privacy grounds, stating, “Privacy is a constitutional right, and publishing open source software is not a crime.” Meanwhile, Storm has claimed that software company Gusto deactivated his account due to the charges, though the firm has not responded to inquiries [1]. Vitalik Buterin’s support, including a X post declaring, “In Ethereum we protect our own, and uphold our honor,” has amplified the debate over the ethical responsibilities of blockchain developers [1].

The trial’s outcome could set a legal precedent for how courts evaluate DeFi developers, balancing innovation with compliance. A conviction might reinforce the government’s position on crypto regulation, while a successful defense could validate privacy tools as essential to the blockchain ecosystem. With closing arguments expected by June 30 or July 1, the case highlights the growing scrutiny of decentralized technologies in an evolving financial landscape.

Sources: [1] [Ethereum Core Developer Testifies Roman Storm] [https://cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-core-developer-testifies-roman-storm]

[2] [U.S. Justice Rests Case in Tornado Cash Trial] [https://www.ainvest.com/news/ethereum-news-today-justice-rests-case-tornado-cash-trial-defense-calls-core-ethereum-developer-pivotal-witness-2507/]

[3] [ETH Core Developer Testifies in Roman Storm Defense] [https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/27390462808002]