Ethereum's FOCIL Proposal: A Game Changer or a Legal Time Bomb?

Ethereum’s Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL), proposed under EIP-7805, has emerged as a pivotal debate in the blockchain space. Designed to enhance censorship resistance by ensuring guaranteed transaction inclusion, FOCIL introduces a mechanism where validators are assigned to inclusion list committees, broadcasting transactions from the mempool for inclusion in blocks [1]. While proponents argue it strengthens Ethereum’s decentralization and neutrality, critics warn of legal risks and scalability challenges. This article examines whether FOCIL is a transformative upgrade or a potential liability for Ethereum’s long-term vision.

Decentralization and Censorship Resistance: A Core Ethos

FOCIL’s primary goal is to prevent centralized control over transaction inclusion, a critical issue in Ethereum’s current architecture. By assigning 17 proposers per slot—16 of whom must include pre-selected transactions—FOCIL aims to eliminate the power of block builders to exclude transactions arbitrarily [2]. Vitalik Buterin, a vocal advocate, emphasizes that this design aligns with Ethereum’s “dumb pipe” philosophy, ensuring no single entity can dictate transaction flow [3].

The proposal has garnered strong support from developers and the community, with some stakeholders ranking it as their top priority for the Glamsterdam upgrade [4]. Relay Inclusion Lists (rILs), an out-of-protocol implementation, further demonstrate FOCIL’s potential to decentralize block production by using deterministic rules for transaction selection [5]. These innovations underscore Ethereum’s commitment to maintaining its role as a neutral, open platform.

However, critics like Ameen Soleimani from Reflexer Labs caution that FOCIL’s design could expose validators to legal risks. In jurisdictions with strict sanctions enforcement, validators may be forced to include transactions from sanctioned addresses, leaving them liable for regulatory violations [6]. This tension between decentralization and compliance highlights a fundamental challenge: how to preserve Ethereum’s ethos while navigating an increasingly complex regulatory landscape.

Legal Risks: A Double-Edged Sword

FOCIL’s legal risks stem from its enforcement of transaction inclusion, which removes validators’ discretion to filter transactions. In the U.S., for example, validators could face penalties under the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for including transactions involving sanctioned entities [7]. Soleimani argues that this lack of discretion undermines Ethereum’s practicality, as validators may avoid participation altogether to mitigate liability [6].

The regulatory environment in 2025 adds another layer of complexity. While Ethereum ETFs have attracted $33 billion in inflows, institutional adoption hinges on clear compliance frameworks [8]. The SEC’s informal commodity classification of Ethereum under the CLARITY Act has bolstered confidence, but ambiguities remain. For instance, the Dencun upgrade’s reduction of Layer 2 (L2) transaction costs has shifted activity away from the mainnet, complicating fee generation for ETH holders [9]. These dynamics suggest that FOCIL’s success will depend on regulatory clarity and the ability to balance decentralization with legal safeguards.

Scalability and Technical Trade-Offs: The Trilemma Revisited

Scalability remains a critical concern for FOCIL. While the proposal enhances censorship resistance, its reliance on cryptographic tools like Threshold Encryption and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) introduces technical complexity [10]. Integrating these tools at the protocol level requires significant development effort, raising questions about Ethereum’s ability to maintain throughput without compromising decentralization.

Layer 2 solutions, such as ZK-Rollups and Optimistic Rollups, offer complementary scalability. The Dencun upgrade has already reduced L2 transaction costs, but centralized sequencers in many rollups pose new censorship risks [11]. “Based rollups,” which shift sequencing back to Ethereum’s validator set, aim to address this by aligning economic incentives between L1 and L2 [12]. However, the proliferation of over 200 ZK-rollup projects highlights a fragmented ecosystem, where interoperability and user experience remain unresolved challenges [13].

FOCIL’s scalability must also contend with the “scalability trilemma”—the difficulty of simultaneously maximizing scalability, security, and decentralization. While FOCIL’s inclusion lists improve censorship resistance, they may strain network resources, particularly if adoption outpaces infrastructure improvements.

Future Outlook: Navigating the Path Forward

Ethereum’s roadmap for 2025-2026 includes the Fusaka upgrade, prioritizing Peer Data Availability Sampling (PeerDAS) and gas limit adjustments to address scalability [14]. The Glamsterdam upgrade, slated for mid-2026, may integrate FOCIL if testing confirms its robustness. Institutional adoption, driven by Ethereum’s 4.8% staking yield and deflationary supply model, further positions it as a macroeconomic hedge [8].

Price projections for Ethereum remain mixed. While technical indicators suggest a short-term bearish trend, long-term optimism persists, with institutions like Bernstein projecting $7,500 to $25,000 by 2028 [15]. These forecasts hinge on Ethereum’s ability to balance decentralization with regulatory compliance and scalability.

Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment for Ethereum

FOCIL represents a bold step toward Ethereum’s vision of a decentralized, censorship-resistant network. However, its success hinges on resolving legal risks and technical trade-offs. The debate underscores a broader tension in blockchain development: how to innovate without compromising core principles. For investors, FOCIL’s implementation will be a litmus test for Ethereum’s ability to navigate regulatory and scalability challenges while maintaining its position as the leading programmable money infrastructure.

Source:
[1] FOCIL (EIP-7805) CFI'd with Strong Developer & Community Backing,
https://etherworld.co/2025/08/10/focil-eip-7805-cfid-with-strong-developer-community-backing/
[2] Vitalik Buterin Makes New Proposal to Enhance Censorship Resistance,
https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-1064172-20250824
[3] Ethereum's New Era: FOCIL and Its Impact on Crypto Business Compliance,
https://www.onesafe.io/blog/ethereum-focil-implications-crypto-business-compliance
[4] FOCIL (EIP-7805) CFI'd with Strong Developer & Community Backing,
https://etherworld.co/2025/08/10/focil-eip-7805-cfid-with-strong-developer-community-backing/
[5] Relay Inclusion Lists - Block proposer,
https://ethresear.ch/t/relay-inclusion-lists/22218
[6] Ethereum Co-Founder Sounds Alarm on Censorship,
https://www.mexc.com/en-GB/news/ethereum-co-founder-sounds-alarm-on-censorship-but-his-solution-sparks-controversy/72031
[7] Ethereum's FOCIL (Form 497) Proposal Faces Regulatory Challenges,
https://www.publicnow.com/view/D3847913EDC6ED8C75742525754171DB7941F96B?1751478494
[8] Ethereum ETF: Why Institutional Adoption Is Surging in 2025,
https://www.okx.com/learn/ethereum-etf-institutional-adoption-2025
[9] Ethereum (ETH) Price Prediction: Seven Days of Selling ...,
https://coincentral.com/ethereum-eth-price-prediction-seven-days-of-selling-pressure-test-bulls-resolve/
[10] Brainbot Strategic Product Decision Making for Shutter (2023-2025),
https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/brainbot-strategic-product-decision-making-and-retrospective-for-shutter-2023-2025/666
[11] Blockchain Beyond 2024: Trends, Insights, and Predictions for 2025,
https://everstake.one/blog/blockchain-beyond-2024-trends-insights-and-predictions-for-2025
[12] Is the Future of Ethereum Rollups Based?
https://www.dwf-labs.com/research/453-ethereum-based-rollups-explained
[13] Ethereum Layer 2 Solutions Explained: Arbitrum, Optimism, and,
https://levex.com/blog/ethereum-layer-2-solutions-explained
[14] Ethereum's fusaka upgrade takes priority as deadlines loom,
https://cryptoslate.com/ethereums-q4-fusaka-upgrade-at-risk-as-developers-fixate-on-2026-glamsterdam-plans/
[15] How High Can Ethereum Go? Expert Analysis Shows $25K ...,
https://yellow.com/research/how-high-can-ethereum-go-expert-analysis-shows-dollar25k-potential-as-institutional-adoption-surges