Ethereum's Exit Queue Surge Exposes Vulnerabilities in Liquid Staking Markets.
ByAinvest
Monday, Jul 28, 2025 12:05 am ET1min read
ETH--
Ethereum's validator exit queue has dramatically surged since July 16, driven by structural stresses triggered by spiking ETH borrow rates and the unwinding of leveraged staking strategies. The liquidity crunch was initially sparked by large ETH withdrawals from a wallet linked to the HTX exchange, causing ETH borrow rates to skyrocket from a stable 2-3% to as high as 18% [2].
This sudden hike in borrow rates flipped the spread between ether staking yields and borrow rates negative, rendering popular ETH looping strategies unprofitable almost overnight. These looping strategies involve depositing Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) or Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) as collateral and borrowing ETH against them. Traders then use the borrowed ETH to purchase more LSTs or LRTs, re-depositing them to amplify yield as long as staking APR exceeds borrow costs. However, when the spread turned negative, participants were forced to unwind, repaying loans and reclaiming ETH collateral. This action intensified selling pressure on LSTs/LRTs in secondary markets, pushing their discounts to ETH wider.
The surge in unstaking requests led to congestion in Ethereum's exit queue, with wait times escalating to over eight days. This is due to the network's design, which intentionally throttles validator exits to protect consensus stability, allowing only 8-10 validators to exit per epoch. By July 22, the queue ballooned from under 2,000 validators to over 475,000, pushing wait times from under an hour to more than eight days [2].
Despite the congestion, new ETH staking demand has remained strong, with validator entry queues rising to their highest levels since April 2024. This indicates that while some validators are exiting, others are still eager to stake ETH, balancing out the withdrawal volumes [2].
The event highlights the liquidity "fragility" of LST/LRT ecosystems under extreme market conditions, particularly when reliant on leveraged strategies. It underscores the urgency of developing solutions that mitigate duration and redemption risks, such as P2P exit markets and protocol-native liquidity vaults that can ease capital flows during exit spikes.
References
[1] https://en.coinotag.com/breakingnews/eth-pos-network-faces-massive-exit-queue-surge-to-694000-validators-amid-2-64-billion-withdrawals/
[2] https://cryptopotato.com/ethereum-exit-queue-surge-exposes-fragility-in-liquid-staking-markets/
Ethereum's validator exit queue has surged since July 16 due to structural stresses triggered by spiking ETH borrow rates and the unwinding of leveraged staking strategies. The liquidity crunch was driven by large ETH withdrawals from a wallet linked to HTX exchange, causing a hike in ETH borrow rates from 2-3% to 18%. This led to the forced unwinding of popular ETH looping strategies, intensifying selling pressure on Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs), and pushing their discounts to ETH wider. The surge in unstaking requests led to congestion in Ethereum's exit queue, with wait times escalating to over eight days.
Title: Ethereum's Validator Exit Queue Surges Amid Spiking ETH Borrow RatesEthereum's validator exit queue has dramatically surged since July 16, driven by structural stresses triggered by spiking ETH borrow rates and the unwinding of leveraged staking strategies. The liquidity crunch was initially sparked by large ETH withdrawals from a wallet linked to the HTX exchange, causing ETH borrow rates to skyrocket from a stable 2-3% to as high as 18% [2].
This sudden hike in borrow rates flipped the spread between ether staking yields and borrow rates negative, rendering popular ETH looping strategies unprofitable almost overnight. These looping strategies involve depositing Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) or Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) as collateral and borrowing ETH against them. Traders then use the borrowed ETH to purchase more LSTs or LRTs, re-depositing them to amplify yield as long as staking APR exceeds borrow costs. However, when the spread turned negative, participants were forced to unwind, repaying loans and reclaiming ETH collateral. This action intensified selling pressure on LSTs/LRTs in secondary markets, pushing their discounts to ETH wider.
The surge in unstaking requests led to congestion in Ethereum's exit queue, with wait times escalating to over eight days. This is due to the network's design, which intentionally throttles validator exits to protect consensus stability, allowing only 8-10 validators to exit per epoch. By July 22, the queue ballooned from under 2,000 validators to over 475,000, pushing wait times from under an hour to more than eight days [2].
Despite the congestion, new ETH staking demand has remained strong, with validator entry queues rising to their highest levels since April 2024. This indicates that while some validators are exiting, others are still eager to stake ETH, balancing out the withdrawal volumes [2].
The event highlights the liquidity "fragility" of LST/LRT ecosystems under extreme market conditions, particularly when reliant on leveraged strategies. It underscores the urgency of developing solutions that mitigate duration and redemption risks, such as P2P exit markets and protocol-native liquidity vaults that can ease capital flows during exit spikes.
References
[1] https://en.coinotag.com/breakingnews/eth-pos-network-faces-massive-exit-queue-surge-to-694000-validators-amid-2-64-billion-withdrawals/
[2] https://cryptopotato.com/ethereum-exit-queue-surge-exposes-fragility-in-liquid-staking-markets/

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue



Comments
No comments yet