ERCOT's RTC+B Market Reform and Its Impact on Energy Storage Valuation


Financial Implications for Battery Asset Owners
The RTC+B framework replaces the outdated ORDC with Ancillary Service Demand Curves (ASDCs), which better reflect the scarcity value of specific services like frequency regulation and voltage support. This change has redefined revenue streams for battery operators, who previously relied heavily on ancillary services for income. In the first half of 2025, prior to RTC+B, 42% of battery revenue in ERCOT came from AS, with the remainder split between day-ahead (DA) and real-time (RT) energy markets. Post-implementation, however, average annual revenue for BESS dropped sharply from $149 per kilowatt in 2023 to just $17 per kilowatt in 2025, driven by market saturation and declining ancillary service prices.
Despite these headwinds, the reform has created new avenues for value capture. By modeling batteries as a single device with a state of charge (SoC), operators can now submit multiple bid pairs for energy and AS in real time, enabling more nuanced participation in dynamic markets. Case studies by Enverus demonstrate that co-optimization can reduce total system costs by up to 5.5% through improved asset utilization and avoidance of renewable curtailment.
In a "Solar Cliff" scenario, real-time adjustments to battery dispatch based on solar forecast uncertainty helped prevent price spikes and ancillary service shortages. These capabilities suggest that while revenue per kilowatt has contracted, the flexibility to respond to grid needs in real time could offset some losses.
Operational Strategy Shifts
The operational complexity for battery owners has increased significantly under RTC+B. The reform requires detailed data submissions on SoC and ancillary service deployment, alongside adherence to stricter qualification tests for AS. Asset owners must now navigate the Constraint Competitiveness Test (CCT), which evaluates both the injection and withdrawal capabilities of batteries in the portfolio. This has necessitated the adoption of advanced optimization tools, such as Ascend Analytics' SmartBidder, to manage SoC constraints and align bids with real-time market signals.
Moreover, the co-optimization of energy and AS has altered arbitrage opportunities. Prior to RTC+B, operators could lock in DA energy prices and hedge against RT volatility. Now, the volatility between DA and RT markets has diminished, reducing traditional arbitrage margins. Instead, success hinges on dynamic SoC management and the ability to capture value from ancillary services during periods of grid stress. For example, in the "Swap the Reg" case study, batteries shifted their output during high locational marginal price (LMP) hours, achieving a 2.7% reduction in total system costs. Such strategies highlight the growing importance of real-time responsiveness and technical agility.
Impact on Clean Energy Buyers
For clean energy buyers, RTC+B has amplified the role of batteries in enabling renewable integration. By preventing curtailment during solar ramps or wind drops, the reform supports the deployment of long-duration storage and complements corporate sustainability goals. In 2025, over 6 gigawatts of clean firm energy capacity-including nuclear, geothermal, and advanced storage-were announced, with corporations accounting for more than half of these commitments. This trend reflects a strategic pivot toward stable, low-carbon resources as buyers seek to hedge against regulatory and market uncertainties.
However, the transition to RTC+B has also exposed challenges in interconnection and coordination. Large-scale projects, such as Google's AI data centers, have underscored the need for better alignment between transmission and distribution service providers to avoid capacity degradation. Additionally, the phaseout of federal tax credits for solar and wind in 2026 has added financial pressure to clean energy projects, making the efficiency gains from RTC+B critical for maintaining competitiveness.
Challenges and Future Outlook
While ERCOT projects $2.5–$6.4 billion in annual wholesale market savings from RTC+B, asset owners face a paradox: operational efficiency gains are offset by compressed margins. The market saturation that drove revenue declines in 2025 is expected to persist, with BESS operators competing for a shrinking pie of ancillary service contracts. To thrive, operators must prioritize node-specific strategies, leveraging granular data on LMP volatility and transmission constraints.
For investors, the key takeaway is that RTC+B has redefined the value proposition of energy storage. Batteries are no longer just static assets but dynamic participants in a fast-evolving market. Success will depend on the ability to integrate advanced analytics, navigate regulatory shifts, and align with the broader decarbonization agenda. As one industry analyst notes, "The winners in this new era will be those who treat storage as a software-driven asset, not just a hardware play."
Conclusion
ERCOT's RTC+B reform has fundamentally altered the financial and operational landscape for battery storage and clean energy buyers. While the initial financial metrics are sobering, the long-term potential for cost savings, grid resilience, and renewable integration remains substantial. For asset owners, the path forward lies in embracing technological sophistication and strategic agility. For clean energy buyers, the reform underscores the growing importance of diversified, low-carbon portfolios. As the Texas grid evolves, the ability to adapt to real-time market signals will separate the leaders from the laggards in this high-stakes energy transition.
Blending traditional trading wisdom with cutting-edge cryptocurrency insights.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet