EMECOR Tumbles 1.55% as Sector Woes Weigh on 421st-Ranked $270M Volume Day

On September 16, 2025, , ranking 421st in market activity for the day. , underperforming broader market indices despite moderate trading interest.

Analysts attributed the decline to sector-specific pressures in the electrical contracting and energy services industry. Recent regulatory reviews of utility contracts and delays in federal infrastructure funding proposals have created near-term uncertainty for firms operating in EMCOR's core markets. The company's recent earnings report, while meeting revenue expectations, highlighted margin compression in its industrial services segment, which may have weighed on investor sentiment.

Market participants noted that EMCOR's price action aligned with broader underperformance in construction-related equities. The stock's volume-to-price correlation suggests short-term technical weakness, . Institutional ownership metrics showed no significant changes in the past quarter, indicating stable positioning despite the recent pullback.

To run this back-test rigorously I need a few additional details and (given the toolset we have available) we may also want to agree on some practical simplifications. Please let me know your preferences on the following: 1. Universe definition • Do you want "all U.S. listed common stocks" (several thousands) or a specific subset (e.g., S&P 1500, Russell 3000, etc.) from which the daily top-500-by-volume list will be drawn? • If you already have a ticker list you’d like me to use, feel free to provide it. 2. Trade timing convention • The classic implementation is: rank today at the close, buy the selected names at today’s close, and liquidate them at tomorrow’s close (close-to-close return). Is that acceptable, or would you prefer a different entry/exit convention (open-to-open, close-to-open, etc.)? 3. Weighting scheme • Equal-weighted across the 500 names (default) or volume-weighted / market-cap-weighted? 4. Transaction costs & slippage • Should we ignore these for now (default), or apply a particular percent cost each side? Once we nail down the above I can generate the data-retrieval plan and run the back-test.