EA Shares Climb on NYCFC Partnership Despite 296th-Ranked Trading Volume

On September 5, 2025, Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: EA) closed with a 0.35% gain, despite a 34.98% decline in trading volume to $0.37 billion, ranking 296th in market activity. The stock’s performance coincided with the announcement of an extended partnership between EA SPORTS and New York City FC, a Major League Soccer (MLS) team. The renewed collaboration designates EA SPORTS as an official club partner, aiming to deepen fan engagement through exclusive content, matchday activations, and digital integration. EA SPORTS FC 26, set to launch on September 26, 2025, will feature the club’s roster, further embedding NYCFC within the game’s global football simulation ecosystem.

The partnership underscores EA’s strategy to leverage sports franchises for immersive digital experiences. By aligning with NYCFC, EA strengthens its presence in U.S. football fandom, capitalizing on the club’s growing influence in MLS. The collaboration also highlights EA SPORTS FC 26’s emphasis on authenticity, with partnerships across 300+ football organizations globally. The game’s inclusion of MLS and NWSL teams, alongside 20,000+ athletes and 120+ stadiums, positions it as a competitive offering in the sports gaming sector.

For EA, the partnership renewal aligns with its focus on expanding digital engagement through live-event integration and virtual platforms. The timing of the announcement, just days before the game’s launch, suggests a coordinated marketing effort to drive pre-orders and player retention. With pre-orders already available across multiple platforms, the collaboration may contribute to sustained post-launch momentum for EA SPORTS FC 26, particularly in markets where NYCFC has a strong fanbase.

To set up this back-test rigorously I need to pin down a few practical details: 1. Universe • Do you mean all U.S. exchange-listed common stocks (≈7,000 tickers) or a narrower set such as S&P 1500 / Russell 3000 constituents? • ADRs, ETFs, preferred shares, SPACs, etc. – include or exclude? 2. Ranking rule • “Daily trading volume” – should the ranking be by share count or dollar value (volume × price)? • Pick the top 500 at the close of each trading day and enter positions at that same close? 3. Holding & sizing • Equal-weight each stock (i.e., 1/500 per position) or weight by volume rank? • No overlap: sell the entire basket the next day at the close, then rebuild a new basket? 4. Frictions • Assume zero transaction cost and perfect liquidity, or apply a cost estimate (e.g., 2 bp per side)? 5. Data source preference • If you have a preferred data vendor / exchange (e.g., consolidated tape vs. Nasdaq only), please specify. Tool note: Our back-testing engine expects a single “ticker” field, so to implement a 500-stock basket I’ll generate a daily synthetic “basket return series” from the constituent list and feed that synthetic series into the engine. All steps and assumptions will be shown transparently. Let me know your choices (or tell me to use the default assumptions below) and I’ll run the test: Default assumptions I can apply if you don’t specify differently: • Universe: all common stocks on NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE Arca, NYSE American. • Rank by dollar volume (shares × close price). • Trade at the official 16:00 ET close, equal-weight basket, no overlaps. • Zero transaction cost. • Data: consolidated U.S. equity tape. Please confirm or amend these points and I’ll proceed.