Duke Energy Shares Drop 1.73% as $500M Volume Surges 87% to 233rd Rank

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Tuesday, Sep 16, 2025 7:23 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Duke Energy (DUK) fell 1.73% on Sept. 16, 2025, with a $500M volume surge (87.25% increase), ranking 233rd in U.S. equity trading.

- Regulatory grid modernization funding in Carolinas and renewable energy transition scrutiny drive short-term volatility amid North Carolina infrastructure bill debates.

- Volume-based trading strategy back-tests require precise parameters: market definitions, pricing conventions, weighting schemes, and data coverage constraints to ensure accurate execution feasibility.

. 16, 2025, , . . equities listed that day.

Recent market movements reflect broader energy sector dynamics as regulators in the Carolinas finalize grid modernization funding allocations. The company remains under scrutiny for its timeline, with analysts noting potential short-term volatility amid pending negotiations in North Carolina.

Back-testing parameters for volume-based trading strategies require precise execution criteria. Key considerations include selecting the (e.g., U.S. listed equities, NYSE/NASDAQ focus), entry/exit price conventions (close-to-close vs. open-to-open), and weighting methodologies for the top 500 volume names. Transaction cost assumptions and data scope limitations—such as restricting to Russell 3000 constituents—also impact implementation feasibility.

To run this back-test robustly, confirmation is needed on: 1) market/exchange definitions for volume screening; 2) pricing conventions for trade execution; 3) and friction assumptions; and 4) data coverage constraints. These parameters will determine the accuracy of performance metrics and practicality of strategy execution.

Encuentren esos activos que tienen un volumen de transacciones explosivo.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet