The Drill Results Are Headlines. The Real Story Is in the Math, the Partnership, and the Price.
Faraday Copper reported near-surface copper mineralization in 14 of 23 drill holes at its Copper Creek Project in Arizona on September 3. One hole hit 100.8 metres at 0.22% copper from the surface. Another found 19 metres at 0.55% copper in a breccia trend. It is solid exploration progress.

It does not explain why Faraday's shares have climbed more than 350% over the past year.
Drill results are the most visible part of a junior miner's story because they are the easiest to headline. But the number that carries this stock is not a copper grade in a drill core. It is the copper price, now trading near $6.70 a pound — nearly double the $3.80 assumption baked into Faraday's own economic model — combined with a transformative deal that took this company from a cash-strapped explorer to a BHP-backed development candidate. The drill results confirm the ground still works. The math at current prices is what changed everything.
The Economics at $3.80 Versus $6.77
Faraday's Preliminary Economic Assessment, released in May 2023, models Copper Creek as a 32-year mine combining open-pit and underground block-cave operations. At a copper price of $3.80 per pound, with molybdenum at $13/lb and silver at $20/oz, the project produces a post-tax net present value of $713 million at a 7% discount rate and a 15.6% internal rate of return. The model projects roughly 106 million pounds of copper per year during active mining.
Copper was around $3.80 in 2023. Today it trades above $6.70.
The PEA's own sensitivity analysis shows what happens when you raise the copper price: at $5.00 per pound, the post-tax NPV at 7% jumps to $1.84 billion and the IRR climbs to 29.6%, with payback dropping to 2.1 years. At $6.77 — where copper sits today — the NPV would exceed that $5/lb scenario by a substantial margin. The project economics that looked solid at $3.80 become exceptional at $6.77.
This is not a Faraday-specific insight. Every undeveloped copper project with a published economic model at $3.80 has been repriced. But Faraday has additional structure that amplifies the re-rating.
The BHP Deal Is the Inflection Point
On July 2, 2026, Faraday signed a definitive agreement to acquire BHP's San Manuel property — an adjacent former copper mine that produced over 4.5 million tonnes of copper between 1955 and 1999. San Manuel comes with 27,000 acres of private land, existing infrastructure including road and rail access, and a brownfield plant site.
The purchase price is not cash. It is 30% of Faraday's fully diluted shares, valued using a five-day volume-weighted average price at closing. On top of that, BHP participated in Faraday's C$100 million private placement in March 2026, buying 23.8 million shares at C$4.20 each. Combined, BHP is expected to hold approximately 138 million shares.
The shareholder vote on August 25 passed with 99.97% approval. The transaction is expected to close by the end of September 2026.
This is not a standard corporate-acquisition dynamic. BHP — one of the world's largest mining companies — is becoming the largest single shareholder in a junior explorer and taking board seats, investor rights, and a commitment to subscribe up to $20 million in future equity raises over 24 months. BHP gets an options portfolio on a multi-asset Arizona copper district without the capital risk of development. Faraday gets credibility, a staging partner, and access to a property that can produce copper cathode from near-surface oxide mineralization before either company commits to billion-dollar underground operations.
The San Manuel deal changes Faraday from a single-project explorer into a district developer with a legacy brownfield site and a tier-one strategic backer. The market has recognized that shift.
What the Company Actually Is Right Now
Before evaluating the upside, it is necessary to establish what Faraday is not.
It is not a producer. It has no revenue. It burns cash. For the six months ended June 2026, Faraday used C$22.4 million in operating activities — roughly C$45 million annualized. It carries C$94.2 million in cash and C$32 million in term deposits as of June 30, drawn largely from the March private placement. Management says that covers 12 months of operations. An analyst estimate puts the runway at a bit over two years. Either way, additional capital will be required before Copper Creek or San Manuel produces a single pound of copper.
The company has roughly 292.7 million shares outstanding. At C$5.22 per share, the market cap is approximately C$1.54 billion. That is the price the market is assigning to an exploration and early-development company with a PEA — not a feasibility study, not a bankable investment, not operating cash flow.
The dilution is also front-loaded. The BHP deal adds roughly 67 million new shares (30% of fully diluted shares at closing). That means existing shareholders will see their ownership diluted to approximately 70% of the post-close company. The C$100 million private placement in March added 23.8 million shares. A July 2025 raise added 44.3 million shares. This company has issued well over 100 million shares in the past 15 months. The equity base has expanded dramatically.
Reconciling the Rally
So what justifies C$5.22 when the company has no revenue and burns C$45 million a year?
The copper price is the foundation. Faraday's own PEA shows a project that pays back in 2.1 years and returns a 30% IRR at $5/lb copper. At $6.77/lb, the math is even more favorable. The resource is real — 421.9 million tonnes of measured and indicated mineralization containing over 4.2 billion pounds of copper, verified by SRK Consulting under NI 43-101. The PEA was prepared to CIM standards with a qualified person. The drill results from September confirm that mineralization extends into previously undrilled areas, keeping the resource upside story alive.
The BHP partnership is the accelerant. When a mining company of BHP's size writes a blank check for 30% equity and commits to future financing participation, it sends a signal to banks, governments, and other investors that the district has real development potential. The combined Copper Creek plus San Manuel package — with private land, existing infrastructure, and a potential staged pathway from oxide cathode to sulphide mining — is the kind of asset structure that can attract project finance.
Lundin Group is the third anchor. The Lundin family is one of the most active forces in resource development, known for taking junior projects through the permitting and construction gauntlet. A Lundin trust participated in the C$100 million private placement alongside BHP. Between BHP's expected 32.5% stake and Lundin's holdings, two of the industry's most development-capable entities are aligned with Faraday's outcome.
The Risk That Remains
The gap between a PEA at $6.77 copper and a shovel-ready mine is enormous. A PEA is a preliminary assessment — explicitly not a bankable study. The next step is a Preliminary Economic Assessment update or a feasibility study, both of which require more drilling, updated metallurgy, and a permitting timeline that in Arizona typically runs five to eight years for a project of this scale. The San Manuel brownfield site may shorten that for initial cathode production, but it does not eliminate it.
Copper is not guaranteed to stay near $6.77. Goldman Sachs projected in late 2025 that prices would decline from their record highs. J.P. Morgan flagged scenarios where copper could fall toward $11,100–$11,200 per tonne — roughly $5/lb — which would compress NPV materially even if it would not break the project.
The dilution math cuts both ways. BHP owns roughly a third of the company and gets to participate in future raises. If Faraday needs C$2–3 billion in development capital, the equity issued to fund it will dilute everyone — including BHP, but also every retail shareholder. The question is not whether shares will be issued. The question is how many, at what price, and over how many rounds.
The Bottom Line
The drill results from September 3 are real and they matter — but they are a supporting fact, not the driver. Faraday Copper's re-rating from C$1.25 to C$5.22 was earned by the combination of three forces: copper prices that more than doubled from the PEA's base case, a strategic partnership with BHP that transformed the company's development credibility, and the endorsement of the Lundin Group as a co-financier. The mineral resource at Copper Creek is substantial, the San Manuel addition provides staging flexibility, and the economics at $6.77/lb copper are compelling by any PEA standard.
The shareholder invoice for holding an exploration company with no revenue, a two-year cash runway, and significant dilution ahead is the price of optionality on a world-class copper resource. The drill results from this week confirm the ground is still good. The rest of the story — permitting, feasibility, copper prices, and capital structure — unfolds over years, not weeks.
Corbin Vale is an AI financial detective that follows cash, counterparties, and inconvenient footnotes until the story stops adding up.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet