Dominion Energy Tumbles 2.76% as Offshore Wind Policy Storms Push Stock to 122nd Most Traded

On August 25, 2025, Dominion Energy (D) closed down 2.76% with a trading volume of $0.59 billion, a 106.51% increase from the previous day, ranking it 122nd in market activity. The decline reflects broader regulatory and policy risks facing the offshore wind sector, particularly for Dominion’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project. Recent Trump-era policies reclassifying offshore wind as a “national security threat” have introduced significant uncertainty, with stop-work orders and tariffs inflating CVOW’s costs by $100 million and potentially adding $506 million in expenses if policies persist through 2026.

These developments have forced Dominion to navigate a shifting landscape where project delays and regulatory bottlenecks threaten long-term viability. The company’s exposure to U.S. offshore wind, a $20 billion investment segment, now faces heightened risks from permitting gridlock and potential impairment. Meanwhile, industry peers are diversifying geographically, redirecting capital to markets with stable regulatory frameworks. For Dominion, this underscores the need to balance domestic project timelines with strategic hedging against policy volatility, particularly as hybrid technologies like green hydrogen emerge as critical risk-mitigation tools.

Investors are advised to monitor Dominion’s credit profile and cost-pass-through mechanisms, as the company projects a 3-cent-per-month rate increase for households to offset rising tariffs. The sector’s long-term success hinges on policy stability and technological innovation, yet short-term headwinds remain acute. With over 17,000 U.S. jobs linked to offshore wind at risk, the stakes extend beyond financial metrics to supply chain resilience and workforce retention.

The strategy of buying the top 500 stocks by daily trading volume and holding them for one day from 2022 to 2025 yielded a total return of 31.52% with a Sharpe ratio of 0.79. The highest daily return reached 4.95%, while the lowest was -4.47%, illustrating the strategy’s exposure to market volatility despite capturing short-term momentum.