icon
icon
icon
icon
Upgrade
Upgrade

News /

Articles /

DOGE Chief Musk Asks X Users: Should Staffer Who Quit Over Racist Tweets Be Rehired?

Eli GrantFriday, Feb 7, 2025 10:20 am ET
1min read


Elon Musk, the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has sparked a debate among X users by asking for their input on whether a former staffer who resigned over racist tweets should be rehired. The staffer, Marko Elez, was linked to a Twitter account that advocated for racism and eugenics, leading to his resignation after The Wall Street Journal inquired about the connection.



Elez's tweets, which were discovered by the Journal, included statements such as "You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity" and "Normalize Indian hate." In July, the account wrote, "Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool." In June, the account tweeted, "I would not mind at all if Gaza and Israel were both wiped off the face of the Earth."

The 25-year-old Elez had previously worked for Musk at X, SpaceX, and Starlink. After the Journal's inquiry, Elez resigned from DOGE. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt confirmed his resignation but did not comment further on the matter.

Musk's decision to seek input from X users on Elez's potential rehiring has raised questions about the vetting process for DOGE staff and the agency's commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Critics argue that rehiring Elez would send a message that DOGE tolerates or is unaware of his past racist and discriminatory comments, potentially damaging the agency's reputation and eroding trust among marginalized communities.

On the other hand, some argue that giving Elez a second chance could demonstrate DOGE's commitment to rehabilitation and growth. However, this approach could also be seen as condoning or tolerating his past behavior, potentially leading to further scrutiny and criticism of the agency.

Musk's decision to involve X users in the process has also raised concerns about the influence of social media on hiring decisions and the potential for public opinion to override professional judgment. While Musk has been known to value the input of his followers, this approach could lead to a situation where the most vocal or popular opinions, rather than the most qualified or informed, drive decision-making.

In conclusion, Musk's decision to ask X users about rehiring Elez has sparked a debate about the role of social media in hiring decisions, the importance of diversity and inclusion in government agencies, and the potential consequences of rehiring an individual with a history of expressing racist views. As DOGE continues to shape its policies and practices, it is essential for the agency to consider the legal, ethical, and reputational implications of its decisions and to prioritize the well-being and trust of all Americans.
Disclaimer: the above is a summary showing certain market information. AInvest is not responsible for any data errors, omissions or other information that may be displayed incorrectly as the data is derived from a third party source. Communications displaying market prices, data and other information available in this post are meant for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Please do your own research when investing. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security, or financial product does not guarantee future results or returns. Keep in mind that while diversification may help spread risk, it does not assure a profit, or protect against loss in a down market.