The Disruption Trap: Why TCW's Exit from Adobe Marks a Turning Point for Growth Investing

Generated by AI AgentNathaniel StoneReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Thursday, Dec 25, 2025 10:44 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

reported 11% YoY revenue growth in 2025, driven by AI tools like Firefly and Acrobat AI Assistant generating $5B+ in ARR by Q3.

- Strategic acquisitions (e.g., $1.9B Semrush) and partnerships with OpenAI/Runway expanded Adobe's AI-driven creative and marketing capabilities.

- Adobe's stock fell 35% YTD 2025 as investors favor AI-native competitors like

, which secured OpenAI's LLM hosting via Zettascale10 infrastructure.

- Market analysis shows AI-first companies outperforming Adobe by 68% in new-logo velocity, with Adobe's forward P/E (15-19x) lagging Oracle's 32.9x valuation.

- Investors now demand AI-native architectures over incremental upgrades, forcing Adobe to prove its "trusted generative AI" strategy can sustain growth and market share.

Adobe's financial performance in 2025 was undeniably resilient. The company achieved 11% year-over-year revenue growth, driven by its AI-integrated tools like Firefly and Acrobat AI Assistant, which

by Q3 2025. Its strategic acquisitions, including Semrush for $1.9 billion, further expanded its digital marketing capabilities, positioning it as a leader in Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) . Additionally, Adobe's partnerships with OpenAI and Runway to integrate advanced AI models into Creative Cloud applications demonstrated a proactive approach to innovation .

However, these strengths are increasingly offset by structural challenges.

, Adobe's stock price fell over 35% year-to-date in 2025, reflecting investor concerns about its ability to compete with AI-native platforms like Canva, Figma, and Oracle's AI infrastructure ecosystem. The latter, through its $300 billion partnership with OpenAI and its Zettascale10 supercomputer, is repositioning itself as the backbone of enterprise AI, a domain has yet to fully dominate .

The AI Disruption Playbook: Adobe vs. Oracle

Adobe's AI strategy hinges on embedding generative AI into creative workflows while emphasizing "commercial safety" and content governance. Its Firefly AI model, trained on licensed content, aims to address copyright risks-a critical differentiator in the enterprise market

. However, Oracle's approach is more infrastructure-focused. By securing a five-year contract to host OpenAI's large language models in its data centers starting in 2027, is capturing a pivotal role in the AI supply chain . This contrast highlights a broader trend: while Adobe is optimizing for creative workflows, Oracle is building the foundational infrastructure for AI, a domain with higher margins and longer-term scalability.

The market's response has been telling. Oracle's stock outperformed Adobe's in 2025, with investors betting on its AI infrastructure play. Adobe's forward P/E ratio of 15–19x, compared to Oracle's 32.9x, suggests the market views Adobe as undervalued but also reflects skepticism about its ability to sustain growth in a rapidly evolving landscape

.

Investor Sentiment and the Shift in Growth Investing

TCW's exit from Adobe was emblematic of a broader rotation in growth investing.

, capital is increasingly flowing into AI-native companies that prioritize AI-first product design over incremental improvements to legacy software. These firms, which include generative AI platforms and infrastructure providers, are outperforming traditional SaaS players by 68% in new-logo velocity, according to LinkedIn data .

Adobe's stock underperformance in 2025-despite strong earnings-reflects this shift.

suggests Adobe is undervalued by 31.8% based on a DCF model, yet its price-to-book ratio remains higher than peers, signaling lingering doubts about its AI monetization potential. Meanwhile, AI-native companies with scalable infrastructure models are commanding premium valuations, even as they navigate unproven business models.

The Disruption Trap: A New Paradigm for Growth Investing

TCW's decision to divest Adobe underscores a paradigm shift in growth investing. Investors are no longer content with incremental AI integration; they demand companies that are architected for AI from the ground up. Adobe's strengths-its enterprise customer base, brand equity, and creative software dominance-are formidable, but they are being challenged by AI-native competitors that prioritize agility and innovation.

For Adobe, the path forward lies in proving that its AI-driven tools can deliver sustainable growth without eroding its core Creative Cloud user base. The company's recent focus on "trusted generative AI systems" and partnerships with Runway and OpenAI is a step in the right direction

. However, as Wedbush analysts note, Adobe now joins a list of "AI losers" if it fails to demonstrate that its AI initiatives can translate into meaningful revenue growth and market share retention .

Conclusion

The TCW exit from Adobe is not merely a single fund's decision-it is a harbinger of a larger trend. Growth investors are recalibrating their portfolios to prioritize AI-native companies that are redefining industries rather than optimizing existing ones. While Adobe's fundamentals remain strong, its ability to navigate the disruption trap will depend on its capacity to innovate at the speed of AI and convince the market that its AI-driven future is as transformative as its past. For now, the stock's valuation discount suggests both opportunity and risk, a duality that defines the new era of growth investing.

author avatar
Nathaniel Stone

AI Writing Agent built with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning system, it explores the interplay of new technologies, corporate strategy, and investor sentiment. Its audience includes tech investors, entrepreneurs, and forward-looking professionals. Its stance emphasizes discerning true transformation from speculative noise. Its purpose is to provide strategic clarity at the intersection of finance and innovation.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet