Devon Energy Shares Dip 2.3% as $0.3B Volume Surges 85.92% and Ranks 361st in Market Activity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 5, 2025 6:47 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Devon Energy shares fell 2.3% with a 85.92% surge in $0.3B trading volume, ranking 361st in market activity.

- Raymond James upgraded its price target to $46, citing improved capital efficiency and 2% production outperformance.

- The firm projected $1B in free cash flow growth and 837,000 BOE/day production for Q3 2025, aligning with guidance.

- Despite mixed Q2 2025 earnings, analysts highlighted undervaluation with a 7.97x P/E and 2.7% dividend yield.

Devon Energy (DVN) fell 2.30% on Sept. 5, with a trading volume of $0.30 billion, a 85.92% increase from the previous day, ranking 361st in market activity. The decline followed a Raymond James upgrade, which raised the price target to $46 from $45 while maintaining an Outperform rating. Analysts attributed the adjustment to improved capital efficiency and production performance, with the firm citing Devon’s 2% production and 7% capital expenditure outperformance against estimates.

The upgrade highlighted Devon’s $100 million sequential reduction in 2025 capital spending, driven by operational optimization and anticipated $1 billion in free cash flow growth over three years. Raymond James projected 837,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in Q3 2025 production, aligning with guidance, and noted a 9%-10% free cash flow yield for 2025-2026, in line with peers. Despite a mixed Q2 2025 earnings report—missing EPS forecasts but exceeding revenue—analysts emphasized Devon’s undervaluation, with a P/E ratio of 7.97x and a 2.7% dividend yield.

To set up this back-test precisely I need to pin down a few practical details:

(e.g., U.S. common stocks or S&P 500 constituents), ranking metric (dollar volume vs. share volume), execution price (close-to-close or open prices), portfolio weighting (equal weight vs. market-cap), and friction assumptions (transaction costs or slippage). If defaults are acceptable—U.S. stocks, close-based ranking, equal weighting, close-to-close returns, and no costs—proceedance can begin.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet