DeFi's Trust Crisis: Third-Party Mismanagement Exposes Systemic Weaknesses

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 4, 2025 1:39 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Stream Finance halts deposits/withdrawals after $93M loss from third-party mismanagement, triggering XUSD depegging and systemic risks.

- Perkins Coie investigates, highlighting DeFi governance flaws as XUSD’s 58% 24-hour drop impacts $280M in linked loans.

- Industry warns of trust fragility; incident coincides with Balancer’s $116M hack, amplifying crypto sector scrutiny.

- Stream’s crisis underscores risks in DeFi’s reliance on external managers amid broader economic pressures and regulatory tightening.

Stream Finance, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, has suspended all deposits and withdrawals after reporting a $93 million loss linked to an external fund manager. The platform announced the halt on November 4, 2025, and has retained legal firm Perkins Coie LLP to investigate the incident, raising fresh concerns about risk management in the crypto sector, according to

. The loss, attributed to mismanagement by a third-party fund operator, triggered a collapse in confidence, with its algorithmic stablecoin depegging to $0.938 amid a rush of redemptions, according to .

The firm's statement emphasized that liquid assets are being withdrawn and that updates will follow as the investigation progresses. Perkins Coie, known for its expertise in financial investigations, has assigned attorneys Keith Miller and Joseph Cutler to lead the probe, according to

. Stream Finance also noted that pending deposits will remain unprocessed until the matter is resolved. The company cited a "trust-driven sell-off" as a key factor in the crisis, with on-chain analysts observing heavy trading activity on but no direct protocol exploit, as reported by CryptoNews.

The fallout has rippled through DeFi markets. XUSD, which lost 58% of its value in 24 hours, is used as collateral in multiple lending platforms across Ethereum-based networks. Pseudonymous analyst YAM estimated that over $280 million in loans and borrowings rely on Stream-related assets, amplifying systemic risks, according to CoinDesk. The sudden depegging and operational freeze have intensified scrutiny of algorithmic stablecoins, which rely on complex mechanisms to maintain their $1 value.

Industry observers highlight the broader implications for DeFi governance. "This incident underscores the fragility of trust in protocols that depend on third-party managers," said one blockchain analyst, who requested anonymity. The timing of the announcement, coinciding with a $116 million hack at

(BAL), further rattled investor sentiment, according to . While the two events are unrelated, they highlight recurring vulnerabilities in smart contract ecosystems.

Stream Finance's crisis comes amid a challenging year for DeFi. Earlier in 2025, firms like Personalis Inc and SCYNEXIS Inc reported steep quarterly losses, reflecting broader economic pressures, as noted by Coinpedia and CryptoNews. However, the scale of Stream's loss—nearly 100 times larger than those entities' reported deficits—has drawn particular attention. The platform's reliance on external fund managers, a common practice in DeFi to optimize yields, is now under scrutiny.

Perkins Coie's involvement signals a potential precedent for legal accountability in crypto. The firm previously advised Apex Treasury Corp. on a $344.7 million blockchain-focused IPO, showcasing its growing role in the sector. Stream's case may set a benchmark for how DeFi protocols address governance failures, especially as regulators tighten oversight.

For now, users are left in limbo. The platform's promise of "periodic updates" offers little clarity, and the path to recovery remains uncertain. As the investigation unfolds, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in decentralized systems—where trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.