DeFi Regulation Could Force U.S. Innovation Offshore

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Friday, Oct 10, 2025 5:49 am ET2min read
COIN--
USDT--
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Senate Democrats proposed a DeFi "restricted list" under Treasury oversight, requiring KYC checks for non-custodial wallets and empowering regulators to block "too risky" protocols.

- Industry leaders and legal experts condemned the plan as unconstitutional, warning it would force innovation offshore by imposing compliance burdens incompatible with decentralization.

- The proposal derailed bipartisan crypto legislation negotiations, with Republicans calling it "incoherent" and opposing Treasury's expanded regulatory authority over DeFi front-ends.

- Legal challenges loom as the "broker" definition could violate the Administrative Procedure Act, with industry signaling intent to sue over regulatory overreach.

Senate Democrats have introduced a controversial proposal to establish a "restricted list" for DeFi protocols under Treasury Department oversight, sparking immediate backlash from industry leaders and halting bipartisan negotiations on crypto market structure legislation. The proposal, leaked by Punchbowl News and Crypto In America, mandates stringent Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements for DeFi front-ends, including non-custodial wallets, and empowers the Treasury to designate protocols as "too risky," potentially halting their operations in the U.S. Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5]

The draft framework, circulated by a coalition of crypto-friendly Democrats including Sens. Mark Warner and Ruben Gallego, defines DeFi front-end services as "brokers," requiring them to collect user identity data and report transactions to the IRS starting in 2027. Critics argue this effectively bans decentralized finance by imposing compliance burdens incompatible with its decentralized ethos. Jake Chervinsky, a prominent crypto attorney, called the proposal "unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover" that risks driving innovation offshore Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5]. The Blockchain Association warned it would "make compliance impossible" for U.S. firms, pushing development to jurisdictions with lighter regulation Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5].

The proposal has derailed GOP-led efforts to pass the Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), a bipartisan bill aiming to clarify crypto oversight and protect DeFi developers from prosecution. Senate Banking Committee Republicans, including Chair Tim Scott, suspended negotiations, criticizing the Democratic draft as "not a legislative offer" and "incoherent" . The RFIA, introduced in September, sought to assign the CFTC oversight of spot markets while shielding developers from liability, a stark contrast to the Democrats' approach Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5].

Industry leaders, including CoinbaseCOIN-- CEO Brian Armstrong and Digital Chamber VP Zunera Mazhar, condemned the proposal as a "crypto ban" that prioritizes "outdated tools" over innovation. Armstrong stated it would "set innovation back" and prevent the U.S. from becoming the "crypto capital of the world" Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5]. The AFL-CIO also joined the criticism, urging the Senate to oppose the RFIA due to concerns over retirement fund exposure to crypto volatility Tensions over crypto bill boil over in the Senate - Yahoo[5].

The political rift reflects broader ideological divides within the Democratic Party. While pro-crypto senators like Kirsten Gillibrand and Lisa Blunt Rochester advocate for regulatory clarity, figures like Elizabeth Warren have long warned of crypto's risks to financial stability. Schumer privately urged Democrats to withhold support for the stablecoin bill, raising concerns about foreign entities like TetherUSDT-- .

Legal challenges loom large. The proposal's definition of "broker" could force DeFi platforms to comply with regulations incompatible with their decentralized nature. Summer Mersinger of the Blockchain Association noted that "pure DeFi protocols not making money" might qualify as "sufficiently decentralized," but front-ends would face "impossible" compliance hurdles . The industry has signaled intent to sue, arguing the Treasury overstepped its authority under the Administrative Procedure Act Urgent: DeFi Regulation Proposal Faces Massive Backlash[2].

The outcome hinges on whether negotiators can reconcile these tensions. While Democrats insist on addressing "real risks," Republicans demand a bipartisan framework that avoids "political narratives." With the Senate's 60-vote threshold and the Trump family's entanglements in crypto complicating matters, the path to legislation remains uncertain.

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet