AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox



Four whale addresses on Hyperliquid generated $47.5 million in profits by orchestrating a 200% surge in the price of
, the token launched by the blockchain, within minutes on August 27, 2025. The rapid price movement, which pushed XPL to $1.80 from around $0.60, triggered a cascade of liquidations, with one trader reporting a $4.59 million loss and another admitting to a $2.5 million loss on short positions[1]. Blockchain analytics firm Spot On Chain identified wallet 0xb9c as the primary orchestrator, reaping over $15 million in profits[1]. The manipulation exploited Hyperliquid’s isolated oracle system and lack of position limits, enabling whales to clear the order book and liquidate opposing positions[2].The coordinated attack highlighted systemic vulnerabilities in decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms prioritizing user growth over risk management. Hyperliquid’s absence of circuit breakers allowed a $184,000 WETH investment to significantly distort XPL’s spot price, unlike centralized exchanges that rely on external price references[2]. The platform’s decentralized nature, while intended to enhance transparency, left it susceptible to exploitation by large traders with substantial capital. Post-incident, Hyperliquid introduced safeguards such as a 10x hard cap on mark prices relative to an 8-hour exponential moving average and integrated external market data to mitigate future distortions[2]. However, these measures inadvertently created arbitrage opportunities, as XPL’s price diverged between Hyperliquid and Binance[2].
Speculation initially linked one of the whale wallets to
founder Justin Sun, but the claim was retracted by on-chain analyst MLM, who cited incorrect analysis[1]. The wallet in question executed long positions on millions of XPL tokens, liquidating them in under a minute to secure $16 million in profits[1]. As of the incident, the address maintained a 1x leveraged XPL position worth $8.6 million with an unrealized profit of $614,000[1]. Despite the platform’s decentralized ethos, the event raised questions about its ability to protect retail traders from predatory market behavior[3].The manipulation of XPL is part of a broader trend of whale-driven activity in DeFi markets, following a $6.26 million exploit involving the JELLY
in March 2025[1]. Analysts noted that thin liquidity in pre-launch tokens like XPL makes them prime targets for manipulation, with whales leveraging leverage mechanisms to amplify gains and losses[4]. The incident underscores the need for robust governance frameworks, including position limits, circuit breakers, and transparent oracle systems, to prevent similar exploits[2]. Retail traders, meanwhile, are advised to avoid highly leveraged positions in illiquid markets and to diversify investments to mitigate risks[4].Hyperliquid’s response to the XPL event has included both defensive and reactive measures. The platform’s post-incident safeguards aim to stabilize prices but have not fully restored user confidence. The manipulation incident follows a prior exploit in March 2025, raising concerns about the platform’s ability to maintain market integrity[1]. While Hyperliquid’s decentralized structure is designed to eliminate counterparty risk, the XPL episode demonstrates the challenges of balancing transparency with effective risk management in high-leverage environments[3]. The platform’s reputation and user trust now hinge on its capacity to address systemic vulnerabilities without stifling innovation[4].
The XPL manipulation serves as a cautionary tale for both DeFi platforms and retail traders. For platforms, the incident highlights the necessity of proactive risk management, including external price feeds and liquidity safeguards, to prevent exploitation. For traders, it reinforces the importance of understanding market mechanics, liquidity depth, and the risks associated with leveraged positions in nascent assets[4]. As DeFi continues to evolve, the balance between decentralization and regulatory oversight will remain a critical debate, particularly in markets where large actors can disproportionately influence price discovery[2].
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet