DeepSeek Frenzy: Chinese VCs Scramble to Catch Up in AI Race
Harrison BrooksTuesday, Feb 11, 2025 4:46 am ET


The meteoric rise of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, has sent shockwaves through the tech industry and left Chinese venture capitalists (VCs) scrambling to catch up in the AI race. DeepSeek's open-source, cost-effective AI model, DeepSeek-R1, has captured worldwide attention and sparked a frenzy of investment in the AI sector. However, many Chinese VCs find themselves on the sidelines, struggling to keep pace with the rapid developments in the field.
According to a report by Accenture, 87% of surveyed Chinese companies plan to ramp up AI investment in 2025, with 58% of business executives feeling that their enterprises' AI development is proceeding faster than initially expected. This increased investment is concentrated on core technology infrastructure and data, such as AI platforms, cloud and data management, and talent and skills development.
However, the sudden surge in interest and investment in DeepSeek has highlighted the challenges faced by Chinese VCs in capitalizing on the AI boom without being left on the sidelines. The tightening of US export controls on AI chips has made it difficult for Chinese startups to access advanced hardware, limiting their ability to train large language models and maintain competitiveness. Additionally, the intense competition in the AI sector, both domestically and internationally, makes it challenging for startups to stand out and secure funding.

To capitalize on the AI boom and remain competitive, Chinese VCs are employing various strategies. One approach is to invest in AI startups that are developing cutting-edge technologies, such as generative AI. For example, Chinese AI startup Moonshot is currently in discussions with investors to secure additional funding, which would increase its valuation to $3 billion. Tencent is reportedly in talks to invest in the one-year-old company, joining rival Alibaba, which led the previous funding round.
Another strategy is to invest in AI infrastructure, such as processors and infrastructure needed to support the training of large language models. In the first half of 2024, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu had a combined capital expenditure of RMB 50 billion ($7 billion), up from RMB 23 billion in the same period last year. This investment is primarily focused on acquiring processors and infrastructure needed to support the training of large language models for AI.
Chinese VCs are also investing in AI startups that are developing new AI-powered products or services. According to Accenture's report, Chinese executives' primary focus for investment in generative AI is creating new AI-powered products or services. This strategy allows venture capitalists to capitalize on the AI boom and remain competitive in the fast-changing market.
In conclusion, the DeepSeek frenzy has left Chinese VCs on the sidelines, struggling to keep pace with the rapid developments in the AI sector. To capitalize on the AI boom and remain competitive, Chinese VCs are employing strategies such as investing in cutting-edge technologies, AI infrastructure, and new AI-powered products or services. By focusing on these opportunities and differentiation strategies, Chinese AI startups can navigate the competitive landscape and carve out their own niches, even in the face of challenges posed by competitors like DeepSeek.
Disclaimer: The news articles available on this platform are generated in whole or in part by artificial intelligence and may not have been reviewed or fact checked by human editors. While we make reasonable efforts to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the truthfulness, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. It is your sole responsibility to independently verify any facts, statements, or claims prior to acting upon them. Ainvest Fintech Inc expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, or harm arising from the use of or reliance on AI-generated content, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.
Comments
No comments yet