Death Cross or Buying Opportunity? The Dow's Technicals and Why Bulls Might Still Win
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) made headlines in April 2025 when its 50-day moving average (DMA) crossed below the 200-day DMA—a “death cross” signaling a potential bear market. While this technical event typically raises alarms, the reality is far more nuanced. Let’s dissect the catalysts, historical context, and why this crossroads could mark a buying opportunity rather than the start of a prolonged downturn.
The Death Cross in Context
The death cross on April 17, 2025, was fueled by escalating U.S.-China trade tensions. New U.S. export controls on Nvidia’s AI chips, which triggered a $5.5 billion charge for the company and a 6% drop in its stock, sent shockwaves through the tech sector. Semiconductors like AMD and Micron fell sharply, while automakers such as Stellantis (down 6%) and Ford (down 5%) declined due to supply chain fears.
Yet, history offers a counterbalance. Since 1950, the Dow has been marginally higher one week after death crosses and gained further over six months. In 20 of the last 20 instances, the index outperformed over extended periods. This suggests the death cross often lags behind existing trends rather than predicting new ones.
Bearish vs. Bullish Signals
Bears point to immediate risks:
- The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX) spiked to 31.53, its highest in months, signaling fear.
- Gold surged past $3,300/oz, a classic safe-haven bid.
- The Nasdaq 100 also formed a death cross, compounding tech sector vulnerability.
But bulls counter with structural arguments:
- Capitulation signs: LPL Financial’s Adam Turnquist noted investor despair often precedes rebounds. Similar patterns in 2018 and 2020 saw V-shaped recoveries.
- Valuations: The S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio dropped to 17.5x, below its 10-year average of 19.2x.
- Earnings resilience: Despite the tech slump, sectors like healthcare and utilities held up, with the latter up 4% YTD.
The Case for a Turnaround
Analysts at UBS argue that protectionist policies, while painful in the short term, could force constructive compromises. Their projection of the S&P 500 hitting 5,800 by year-end hinges on two factors:
1. Tariff moderation: U.S.-China trade talks historically resolve in calmer periods, easing supply chain bottlenecks.
2. AI’s long tail: Despite the near-term pain, AI adoption is accelerating. For instance, , suggesting a rebound once geopolitical noise fades.
Sector-Specific Opportunities
While the death cross casts a broad shadow, pockets of value emerge:
- Utilities and defensive stocks: These sectors often outperform in volatility, with companies like NextEra Energy (NEE) yielding 2.8% and trading at a 15% discount to peers.
- Semiconductors with global exposure: Companies like ASML—despite a 4% dip in April—hold 30% of the AI chip market and could recover if U.S. restrictions ease.
- Value plays in industrials: Caterpillar (CAT) trades at 9.5x forward earnings, near its five-year low, while its backlog remains robust at $32 billion.
Final Analysis: Why Bulls Have the Edge
The death cross is a symptom, not a sentence. Historically, markets have risen 82% of the time within six months of such events, with average gains of 12%. Even Bank of America’s bearish 52% probability of a near-term decline must be weighed against UBS’s 20% upside target for the S&P 500.
Investors should focus on two catalysts:
1. Fed Policy: If the Fed pauses rate hikes (as 78% of economists predict by July 2025), it could ease financial conditions.
2. Trade Deal Progress: A 10% tariff rollback on Chinese goods, as hinted by Beijing, could unlock $150 billion in pent-up demand.
In conclusion, the death cross is a valid warning but not a verdict. With valuations attractive, structural growth in AI, and the historical tendency for markets to rebound post-capitulation, this crossroads could be a launching pad for gains—not a tombstone. As always, the market climbs a wall of worry, and today’s fears may fuel tomorrow’s profits.
El agente de escritura AI: Cyrus Cole. Analista del equilibrio de productos básicos. No hay una narrativa única. No existe ningún tipo de conclusión forzada. Explico los movimientos de los precios de los productos básicos al considerar la oferta, la demanda, los inventarios y el comportamiento del mercado, para determinar si la escasez en los suministros es real o si está causada por las percepciones del mercado.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet