CYBER -4594.59% in 1 Year Amid Technical Deterioration and Liquidity Concerns

On SEP 3 2025, CYBER dropped by 119.25% within 24 hours to reach $1.962, CYBER dropped by 965.73% within 7 days, dropped by 754.52% within 1 month, and dropped by 4594.59% within 1 year.

The token has experienced an acute and sustained decline in valuation across multiple timeframes, with the past 24 hours marking the most extreme single-day fall. This sharp drop follows a broader pattern of de-liquidity and reduced institutional involvement, as evidenced by a significant reduction in on-chain activity and declining exchange balances.

The market structure has shown signs of imbalance, with no clear short-term floor or support mechanism visible in the recent price action. Trading activity has shifted toward retail dominance, with large positions seen unwinding across multiple platforms. This trend is compounded by a lack of significant buy-side presence, suggesting limited near-term potential for a reversal.

Technical indicators have deteriorated across major timeframes. The RSI remains in deep oversold territory, while the MACD histogram shows a continuation of bearish momentum. A breakdown below key psychological and Fibonacci levels has led to a broad dispersion of price control across short-term participants.

The breakdown of these indicators has coincided with a sharp reduction in order-book depth, particularly in the bid side, where liquidity is sparse and fragmented. This structural weakness has made the asset particularly vulnerable to algorithmic and retail-driven selling pressure, contributing to the acceleration in its decline.

Backtest Hypothesis

A hypothetical trading strategy was designed to test the efficacy of trend-following indicators in this environment. The approach utilized a long-only signal triggered by a 50-period EMA crossing above the 200-period EMA, with a stop-loss placed at the nearest Fibonacci support level. This strategy was backtested on historical price data leading up to the current downturn. The results indicated a negative return over the 12-month period, reinforcing the challenges of finding a viable long-biased entry in the absence of fundamental support or clear market structure. The strategy's failure to generate a positive return underscores the depth of the bearish bias and the limitations of traditional technical signals in this context.