AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox



Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of
, has publicly criticized the European Union’s proposed “Chat Control” legislation, warning that the bill poses significant threats to digital privacy and encryption. The regulation, formally known as the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), would mandate that messaging platforms scan private communications—including encrypted messages—for illegal content. Buterin emphasized that such measures inherently undermine privacy, arguing that backdoors created for law enforcement are “inevitably hackable” and compromise the security of all users. His critique aligns with broader concerns from privacy advocates, who view the proposal as a step toward mass surveillance[1].The legislation, if enacted, would apply across a wide range of digital services, including email platforms, gaming chats, dating apps, and app stores. Critics highlight that the law’s reliance on “client-side scanning” forces users to be treated as suspects, with messages scanned on devices before encryption. This approach, Buterin noted, conflicts with the EU’s own Charter of Fundamental Rights, which safeguards privacy and data protection. He further criticized lawmakers for seeking exemptions for themselves, intelligence agencies, and military personnel, calling the hypocrisy “telling”[2]. A leaked draft of the bill reveals that interior ministers aim to avoid the surveillance provisions they advocate for citizens[3].
The political landscape remains divided. Fifteen EU countries currently support the proposal, but the 65% population threshold required for passage has not been met. Germany’s stance is pivotal, with its decision expected to determine the law’s fate. If Germany votes in favor, the legislation is likely to pass; if it opposes, the bill is expected to fail[4]. The debate underscores a broader tension between security and privacy, with proponents arguing the measures are necessary for child protection and opponents framing them as overreach[5].
Crypto and Web3 advocates have amplified these concerns, suggesting the bill could accelerate migration to decentralized platforms. Hans Rempel, CEO of Diode, and Elisenda Fabrega of Brickken argue that users disillusioned by centralized systems may turn to Web3’s “not your keys, not your data” ethos. Fabrega warns that the shift could fragment the EU digital market and weaken its influence on global privacy standards. Both experts caution that granting governments backdoor access increases cybersecurity risks, citing historical data breaches[6].
The controversy has also sparked legal challenges. The proposed law violates Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter, which protect private communications and personal data. Rempel and Fabrega stress that the legislation’s technical flaws and legal contradictions could set a dangerous precedent, potentially normalizing surveillance under the guise of security. As the debate unfolds, the outcome will hinge on Germany’s decision and the EU’s ability to balance competing priorities[7].
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet