Crypto Warns EU: Chat Control Could Spur Web3 Migration

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Saturday, Sep 27, 2025 6:34 am ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin criticizes EU's Chat Control bill for undermining encryption and digital privacy through mandated content scanning.

- The legislation requires encrypted message scanning via "client-side scanning," conflicting with EU privacy rights and creating security risks via hackable backdoors.

- Web3 experts warn the bill could drive users to decentralized platforms, fragmenting the EU market and increasing cybersecurity vulnerabilities through government access.

- Legal challenges cite violations of EU Charter rights, while Germany's decision remains pivotal in determining the law's fate amid security-privacy tensions.

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of

, has publicly criticized the European Union’s proposed “Chat Control” legislation, warning that the bill poses significant threats to digital privacy and encryption. The regulation, formally known as the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), would mandate that messaging platforms scan private communications—including encrypted messages—for illegal content. Buterin emphasized that such measures inherently undermine privacy, arguing that backdoors created for law enforcement are “inevitably hackable” and compromise the security of all users. His critique aligns with broader concerns from privacy advocates, who view the proposal as a step toward mass surveillanceCointelegraph: [Vitalik Buterin Slams EU’s ‘Chat Control’ Bill][1].

The legislation, if enacted, would apply across a wide range of digital services, including email platforms, gaming chats, dating apps, and app stores. Critics highlight that the law’s reliance on “client-side scanning” forces users to be treated as suspects, with messages scanned on devices before encryption. This approach, Buterin noted, conflicts with the EU’s own Charter of Fundamental Rights, which safeguards privacy and data protection. He further criticized lawmakers for seeking exemptions for themselves, intelligence agencies, and military personnel, calling the hypocrisy “telling”Coinpedia: [Vitalik Buterin Warns EU’s Chat Control Could Break Digital Privacy][2]. A leaked draft of the bill reveals that interior ministers aim to avoid the surveillance provisions they advocate for citizensCoinpedia Fintech News: [Vitalik Buterin Warns EU’s Chat Control Could Break Digital Privacy][3].

The political landscape remains divided. Fifteen EU countries currently support the proposal, but the 65% population threshold required for passage has not been met. Germany’s stance is pivotal, with its decision expected to determine the law’s fate. If Germany votes in favor, the legislation is likely to pass; if it opposes, the bill is expected to failTradingView: [Vitalik Slams EU’s Chat Control][4]. The debate underscores a broader tension between security and privacy, with proponents arguing the measures are necessary for child protection and opponents framing them as overreachAltsignals.io: [Ethereum Co-founder Vitalik Buterin Opposes EU's Proposed Chat Control Legislation][5].

Crypto and Web3 advocates have amplified these concerns, suggesting the bill could accelerate migration to decentralized platforms. Hans Rempel, CEO of Diode, and Elisenda Fabrega of Brickken argue that users disillusioned by centralized systems may turn to Web3’s “not your keys, not your data” ethos. Fabrega warns that the shift could fragment the EU digital market and weaken its influence on global privacy standards. Both experts caution that granting governments backdoor access increases cybersecurity risks, citing historical data breachesCointelegraph: [Vitalik Buterin Slams EU’s ‘Chat Control’ Bill][6].

The controversy has also sparked legal challenges. The proposed law violates Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter, which protect private communications and personal data. Rempel and Fabrega stress that the legislation’s technical flaws and legal contradictions could set a dangerous precedent, potentially normalizing surveillance under the guise of security. As the debate unfolds, the outcome will hinge on Germany’s decision and the EU’s ability to balance competing prioritiesCoinpedia: [Vitalik Buterin Warns EU’s Chat Control Could Break Digital Privacy][7].