Crypto's Trust Crisis: Legal Storms Test Grayscale's $33B IPO


Grayscale's proposed $33 billion initial public offering (IPO) faces mounting legal challenges as litigation tied to the collapse of its affiliated entity, Genesis Global Capital, intensifies. The Genesis Litigation Oversight Committee (LOC) has filed two lawsuits-against Digital Currency Group (DCG), its founder Barry Silbert, and other insiders-in Delaware's Court of Chancery and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York[1]. The Delaware complaint alleges that DCG and Silbert treated Genesis as a "treasury" for DCG, recklessly operating and exploiting the insolvent firm until its bankruptcy[1]. The LOC seeks "in-kind recovery of cryptocurrency" for creditors and claims over $1.2 billion in pre-bankruptcy transfers were improperly executed under a disputed "tax sharing agreement"[1].
DCG and Silbert have moved to dismiss the suits, arguing they acted in good faith amid a broader crypto market collapse that triggered multiple lender failures[1]. The company also filed a countersuit in August 2025, seeking $1.1 billion in relief related to a promissory note issued to offset losses from Genesis's default on a $2.36 billion loan to Three Arrows Capital (3AC) in 2022[1]. DCG claims the note's value was nullified by $2.8 billion in 3AC recoveries by May 2024, and it mistakenly paid Genesis $106 million post-voiding[1]. Meanwhile, Genesis has pursued its own claims, seeking $2.2 billion in digital assets and alleging DCG extracted $450 million in crypto and $300 million in international transfers during Genesis's liquidity crisis[1].
Regulatory scrutiny has further complicated the situation. In January 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined DCG $38 million and former Genesis CEO Michael Moro $500,000 for misleading investors about the firm's financial health following the 3AC collapse[1]. Court filings revealed DCG executives were aware of over $1 billion in Genesis losses while continuing to present the business as solvent[1]. Additional legal pressure emerged in September 2025, when the FTX Recovery Trust sued Genesis Digital Assets for $1.15 billion, alleging FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried used misappropriated exchange funds to inflate Genesis share valuations[1].
The litigation has raised concerns among underwriters and regulators about Grayscale's disclosures and DCG's financial entanglements with Genesis[1]. Despite these risks, Grayscale submitted confidential IPO documents to the U.S. SEC in June 2025, positioning the offering as a landmark transaction for crypto asset management[1]. However, industry observers warn that unresolved legal disputes could delay the IPO or erode investor confidence, particularly in a market still reeling from past crypto failures like Celsius and BlockFi[2]. The SEC's recent enforcement actions and the scale of Genesis's liabilities underscore the regulatory and reputational risks facing the IPO[1].
Analysts note that the outcome of these lawsuits could influence broader market trust in crypto asset managers. Genesis's bankruptcy led to a $2 billion settlement in 2023, disrupting lending and liquidity across the sector[2]. Continued litigation may deter institutional investors, who are increasingly cautious about governance and transparency in crypto firms[2]. For Grayscale, the IPO's success hinges on resolving these legal uncertainties while demonstrating robust safeguards against future misconduct[2].
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet