Crypto Regulation Fails to Integrate Technologists, Risking User Privacy

In the realm of crypto regulation, a significant disconnect exists between the traditional financial sector and the technological innovators of the crypto world. This divide is evident in regulatory consultation meetings, where the majority of participants are lawyers and ex-financial services personnel, rather than technologists who understand the intricacies of crypto technology. This imbalance poses a threat to crypto users, as regulations are often drafted without considering the technological solutions that could enhance privacy and security.

An example of this disconnect is the data breach suffered by Coinbase in May 2025, which exposed personal customer data collected during the Know Your Customer (KYC) process. This incident highlighted the vulnerability of centralized data storage and the need for decentralized digital identities and zero-knowledge cryptography. These technologies could prove claims without exposing sensitive data, thereby reducing the risk of data breaches.

The issue extends beyond KYC requirements. Other regulations, such as the Travel Rule and the Cryptoasset Reporting Framework, necessitate the collection and storage of user transaction data and real-world identities. This data-heavy approach is not only inefficient but also exploitative, as it places users' sensitive information under the guardianship of corporate and public authorities.

The rise of physical "wrench attacks" on crypto asset holders in France and other regions underscores the urgency of integrating privacy-enhancing technologies within crypto intermediaries and applications. Failing to do so could lead to a crypto disaster, compromising the security and privacy of users. It is crucial for technologists to engage in regulatory conversations and provide solutions that bridge the gap between technological innovation and regulatory needs.

The crypto industry has a history of introducing techno-regulatory innovations, such as proof-of-reserve systems and privacy pool concepts. These innovations demonstrate the potential for marrying technological advancements with regulatory requirements. However, the current regulatory landscape is dominated by legacy systems and rulemaking, which do not account for the unique properties and potential of the crypto asset sector.

To ensure a future where regulations are tailored to the crypto sector, it is essential to include more technologists in the regulatory conversation. This will help shape policies that prioritize privacy-enhancing technologies and crypto-native solutions. By doing so, the crypto industry can avoid being saddled with rules that fail to innovate and tailor to its unique needs. It is time for technologists to stand up and shape the regulatory future, ensuring that the policy conversation is not held solely by incumbents and traditional financial sector representatives.

AInvest Newsletter

Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox

Get Newsletter with Email

Continue with Google

Or continue with others

Apple

Facebook

X

By continuing, I agree to the Market Data Terms of Service and Privacy Statement