US Crypto Projects Flee to Offshore Havens Amid Regulatory Uncertainty
1min read Launching a crypto project in the United States has long been fraught with uncertainty due to legal ambiguity and a hostile regulatory environment. This has driven many founders to set up their projects in more crypto-friendly jurisdictions like Switzerland and the Cayman Islands. Despite the Trump administration's pro-crypto rhetoric, concrete changes have yet to materialize, leaving the regulatory landscape as challenging as ever.
One of the primary issues facing crypto projects is the need for decentralization to avoid regulatory scrutiny. However, until a project launches its token, a degree of centralization is unavoidable. The SEC's Howey test classifies nearly every legitimate crypto project as a security, creating a Catch-22 situation where projects cannot decentralize without launching a token, but launching a token in the US puts them in the SEC's crosshairs. This has real consequences, as liquidity providers and exchanges avoid US-based projects, effectively boxing out American founders from the global crypto economy.
Ask Aime: "Are US crypto projects being stifled by regulatory hurdles?"
This regulatory failure has led to the rise of offshore legal firms specializing in setting up token-issuing entities. Jurisdictions like Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands have become safe havens for crypto projects, offering structured ways to get legal clarity and flexible corporate structures with less regulatory risk. The irony is that the actual development work often still happens in the US, with token issuance pushed offshore through non-profit entities. This results in unnecessary legal fees and overseas operators, driving talent, investment, and influence away from the US.
To address these issues, the US needs to provide regulatory clarity and recognize that traditional financial regulations do not always apply to crypto. The Howey test needs to be revised to allow tokens a grace period to decentralize, and new protections must be established to prevent insider benefits. The government must also end the "regulation by enforcement" approach and provide clear guidelines for market makers to evaluate US tokens. This would end the blanket bans on US tokens and bring crypto development back to America.
Crypto founders are not waiting for Washington to act, and every day without clear regulations sees more projects incorporated offshore. The US does not need to embrace crypto; it just needs to stop driving it away. To become a leader in crypto, the administration must move beyond campaign slogans and address the fundamental problems that forced the industry offshore. Swift action is needed to prevent the US from missing its window of opportunity in the crypto renaissance.
