Crypto Mining's Energy Pricing Woes Exposed by Tether's Uruguay Exit

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Nov 28, 2025 6:29 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

halts Uruguay mining due to rising energy costs and unresolved tariff disputes, ending a $500M project with 30 layoffs.

- Unpaid $5M electricity bills forced power cuts in July 2025, accelerating the project's collapse despite initial renewable energy ambitions.

- The exit highlights Latin America's regulatory challenges for crypto mining, prompting Tether to shift operations to Paraguay and El Salvador.

- Analysts note energy economics now dominate mining strategies, with firms prioritizing markets offering cheaper power and policy stability.

Tether, the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin

, has halted its mining operations in Uruguay due to escalating energy costs and unresolved tariff disputes, . The company confirmed the shutdown, which included the layoff of 30 employees, following a meeting with Uruguay's Ministry of Labor and Social Security. The move underscores the challenges faced by energy-intensive crypto mining ventures in Latin America, where regulatory and pricing structures often clash with the scalability demands of such projects.

Tether's Uruguay operations, launched in May 2023, were initially hailed as a model for sustainable mining,

. CEO Paolo Ardoino had praised Uruguay's stable grid and modern capacity, envisioning a 300 MW renewable energy park alongside three data centers requiring 165 MW of power.
However, the venture quickly encountered financial headwinds. , particularly the 31.5 kV tariff applied to Tether's Florida site, rendered operations unsustainable. The company repeatedly requested tariff revisions, including a shift to 150 kV rates, but .

ultimately forced the National Administration of Power Plants and Electrical Transmissions (UTE) to cut power supplies to Tether's facilities in July 2025, accelerating the project's collapse. Tether's local subsidiary, Microfin, engaged in ongoing negotiations to resolve the debt, but with no viable path forward. The company attributed the exit to broader systemic issues rather than a single financial dispute, emphasizing the need for predictable tariffs and regulatory flexibility to support large-scale mining projects.

The Uruguay withdrawal highlights a broader trend in Latin America, where energy regulators are tightening pricing structures to prioritize national grid sustainability. Tether's experience mirrors similar challenges faced by other crypto miners, who are increasingly pivoting to markets with cheaper electricity and more favorable policies. The company has already announced plans to expand operations in Paraguay and El Salvador, where it aims to establish mining facilities with capacities between 40 and 70 megawatts. These moves align with Tether's strategy to diversify its energy sources while maintaining its long-term commitment to renewable energy-driven mining.

Analysts note that Tether's exit from Uruguay reflects the precarious economics of crypto mining in high-cost regions. The company had spent approximately $100 million on initial development and allocated $50 million for infrastructure slated to transfer to UTE ownership. Despite these investments, the project's financial model crumbled under the weight of rising tariffs and regulatory inflexibility.

that a shift to 150 kV tolls could have reduced costs and aligned with Tether's scale, but stalled negotiations left the project vulnerable to external pressures.

Tether remains cautious about its future in Uruguay, stating it will monitor developments and reconsider participation under revised terms. However, the immediate focus has shifted to alternative markets, where energy costs and regulatory clarity offer more predictable environments for capital-intensive ventures. The company's pivot underscores the growing importance of energy economics in shaping the global crypto mining landscape, as firms seek regions where energy abundance and policy stability can offset the high operational costs of digital asset production.