Crypto Industry Gains Ground in Washington Policy Battle

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Friday, Jul 18, 2025 2:57 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Caitlin Long claims crypto industry outpaces banks in Washington's regulatory battle, advancing the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act.

- The sector's unified lobbying and coalition with tech firms/venture capital drive favorable policy reforms for digital assets.

- Traditional banks struggle due to fragmentation and reluctance to adopt new technologies, weakening their advocacy.

- Long highlights U.S. fiscal deficits as an opportunity, with crypto markets potentially addressing Treasury demand gaps.

- The policy battle remains unresolved, but crypto's strategic positioning suggests continued regulatory momentum.

The digital asset industry is currently engaged in a significant policy battle in Washington, D.C., with traditional banks on one side and the crypto sector on the other. According to Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long, the crypto industry has been gaining ground in this regulatory contest. Long highlighted that the digital asset industry has been more effective in advocating for its interests, which has led to a more favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

The policy battle revolves around the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act, a proposed legislation aimed at providing regulatory clarity for digital assets. The act seeks to define digital tokens as a distinct asset class, separate from securities, and to establish a clear framework for their regulation. This would allow digital asset companies to operate with greater certainty and reduce the regulatory burden they currently face.

Long emphasized that the crypto industry's success in this policy battle is due to its ability to present a unified front and to effectively communicate its message to policymakers. She noted that the industry has been able to build a strong coalition of supporters, including tech companies, venture capital firms, and individual investors. This coalition has been instrumental in pushing for regulatory reforms that would benefit the digital asset industry.

The traditional banking sector, on the other hand, has been less successful in advocating for its interests in this policy battle. Long suggested that this is due to the banking industry's fragmented nature and its reluctance to embrace new technologies. She argued that banks have been slow to adapt to the changing financial landscape and have failed to recognize the potential of digital assets.

Long says that getting the crypto bills approved has been “an ugly sausage-making process” that clashes traditional finance against the digital asset industries. “You’ve got some pretty powerful interests here. The banks are up against the crypto industry, and so far, the crypto industry has been winning.”

Long says she is optimistic that the crypto industry has the upper hand because of the financial challenges that the US faces. “What problem is the government trying to solve? The US has enormous fiscal deficits and needs to have demand for purchasers of US Treasuries, and the crypto market would never have gotten permission, [though] some of us tried. Folks who went around the regulators and created entire new markets of buyers for US Treasuries, that’s what Congress and the Trump administration are trying to enable here.”

The policy battle over the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act is far from over, and the outcome remains uncertain. However, Long's comments suggest that the digital asset industry is well-positioned to continue making gains in the regulatory arena. As the industry continues to grow and evolve, it will be important for policymakers to strike a balance between promoting innovation and protecting consumers.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet