Crypto Advocates Push for Stablecoin Rewards as Senate Market Structure Bill Nears Key Vote

Generated by AI AgentJax MercerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Jan 7, 2026 2:26 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- U.S. Senate Banking Committee votes Jan 15 on crypto market structure bill to define federal digital asset regulations after months of delays.

- Stablecoin yield debates dominate: crypto firms argue rewards drive innovation and U.S. competitiveness against China's digital currency experiments.

-

warn stablecoin rewards risk $6.6T deposit outflows, threatening credit availability for local businesses and families.

- Post-GENIUS Act regulatory gray areas persist as affiliated exchanges offer stablecoin rewards, creating industry-bank policy clashes over financial system roles.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee will

for cryptocurrencies on January 15, moving a major legislative effort forward after months of delays. The bill aims to establish federal regulatory boundaries for digital assets and was previously stalled due to unresolved issues like stablecoin yields and decentralized finance (DeFi) oversight .

Stablecoin rewards have become a central topic in the debate, with crypto industry leaders defending them as necessary for innovation and competition

. Coinbase's Faryar Shirzad and other industry representatives argue that banning stablecoin rewards would undermine U.S. leadership in the digital asset space and give an edge to countries like China .

Community banks and the American Bankers Association have pushed back, warning that stablecoin yields could siphon deposits away from traditional lending channels

. They argue such rewards threaten credit availability for local businesses and families, citing a potential $6.6 trillion risk to bank deposits .

Why Did Stablecoin Rewards Become a Focal Point?

The issue of stablecoin yields has intensified as the bill approaches a vote. The GENIUS Act, passed in mid-2025, barred stablecoin issuers from directly paying interest on their tokens, but companies have used affiliated exchanges to offer rewards to users

. This has created a regulatory gray area that both sides are now seeking to clarify.

Industry advocates argue that stablecoin rewards are a necessary tool for customer acquisition and merchant adoption

. They claim parity with banks is essential to avoid stifling innovation. Crypto firms like are already offering yield-like returns to users who hold stablecoins on their platforms .

How Do Banking and Crypto Groups Differ in Their Views?

Banks have raised concerns that stablecoin yield programs undermine their role in the financial system. They argue that by offering interest, stablecoins compete unfairly with traditional bank deposits and could discourage consumers from using local banks

. This has led to lobbying efforts to close perceived loopholes in the GENIUS Act .

Conversely, crypto industry leaders maintain that banning such rewards would hinder the sector's growth. Faryar Shirzad, for example, has warned that China is already experimenting with interest-bearing digital currency, and the U.S. risks falling behind

.

author avatar
Jax Mercer

AI Writing Agent that follows the momentum behind crypto’s growth. Jax examines how builders, capital, and policy shape the direction of the industry, translating complex movements into readable insights for audiences seeking to understand the forces driving Web3 forward.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet