Why Cramer's Regret Over Alphabet Signals a Shift to AI Infrastructure Plays

Marcus LeeWednesday, Jun 25, 2025 12:53 pm ET
3min read

In the ever-shifting landscape of tech investing, few moments crystallize the risks of clinging to legacy giants like Jim Cramer's recent admission of regret over selling Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOGL) too soon. Cramer's misstep—selling shares in late 2024 only to watch the stock rebound 8.8% by April 2025—highlights a broader truth: mega-cap tech's dominance is eroding, even as overlooked infrastructure plays in AI and energy emerge as the next frontier for growth. This article explores why Cramer's error underscores the perils of betting on “too big to fail” tech stocks, while underscoring the superior opportunities in AI-driven energy infrastructure companies like

(POWL) and rare earth miners such as (NYSE: MP).

Cramer's Regret: A Cautionary Tale for Mega-Cap Tech Investors

Cramer's regret stems from his sale of Alphabet shares in late 2024, a decision he later admitted was premature. The stock's rebound—driven by stronger-than-expected ad revenue and optimism around its AI investments—exposed a critical flaw in his analysis: underestimating Alphabet's resilience in the AI race. While Cramer acknowledged the company's advancements in AI, YouTube, and Google Cloud, his focus on short-term risks like ChatGPT's competition led him to trim his position. Yet Alphabet's Q1 2025 earnings, which beat expectations, revealed the folly of timing exits in tech's most entrenched players.

This misstep mirrors Cramer's past errors, such as his prolonged advocacy for General Electric—a stock he later called “one of my biggest career mistakes.” The lesson? Even giants like Alphabet face headwinds: regulatory scrutiny, competition from newer AI models, and the relentless need to monetize cutting-edge tech. As Cramer himself noted, “The stock's not expensive because the plan may not work!”—a warning that applies to all mega-caps clinging to legacy revenue streams.

The Broader Risk: Mega-Cap Tech's Structural Challenges

Alphabet's struggles are part of a larger trend. The “Magnificent Seven” (Alphabet,

, , Meta, , , and Tesla) now face a perfect storm:
1. Regulatory Overhang: Antitrust lawsuits, data privacy laws, and global tax reforms are eroding profit margins.
2. AI-Driven Disruption: New players like OpenAI and ChatGPT are nibbling at core revenue streams (e.g., search ads, cloud services).
3. Valuation Pressure: Alphabet's P/E ratio of 19.8 (below its five-year average of 23.3) reflects investor skepticism about its ability to translate AI investments into profits.

Cramer's regret underscores that even companies with dominant positions cannot rest on their laurels. For investors, this means mega-cap tech is now a high-risk, low-reward game—especially as capital shifts toward the infrastructure enabling AI's future.

The Rise of AI Infrastructure: Where the Real Growth Lies

While Cramer's focus on Alphabet highlights the perils of betting on tech's past, the real action lies in the enablers of AI's future: energy infrastructure, rare earth minerals, and manufacturing systems. These sectors are benefiting from twin tailwinds:
1. Trump's “Tech Liberation” Policies: Tariffs on Chinese imports and incentives for domestic manufacturing (e.g., Section 48C tax credits) are forcing companies to reshore critical supply chains.
2. AI's Insatiable Appetite for Resources: Data centers, autonomous vehicles, and advanced semiconductors rely on rare earth metals (neodymium, dysprosium) and energy systems that power hyperscale infrastructure.

Spotlight on Undervalued Winners: Powell Industries and MP Materials

1. Powell Industries (POWL): The Grid Behind the AI Revolution

Why It's Undervalued:
- Growth: Q2 2025 revenue rose 9% YoY to $279 million, with a $1.3 billion backlog.
- Profitability: Net income jumped 38% YoY to $46 million ($3.81 per share).
- Policy Traction: Powell's systems are critical for AI data centers and grid resilience projects under Trump's “Energy Liberation” plan.

Investment Case:
- Valuation: Trades at $215/share (under its $227 “buy” target).
- Upside: Analysts project $14.17 EPS in 2025 (15% YoY growth).
- Risk: Dependent on government infrastructure spending.

2. MP Materials (MP): The Rare Earth Play for AI Magnets

Why It's Undervalued:
- Domestic Production: Largest U.S. rare earth producer, with $58.5M in federal grants to build a magnet manufacturing plant in Texas.
- Growth: Plans to boost rare earth oxide production by 50% within four years.
- China Risk Mitigation: Benefits as tariffs (now at 54% on Chinese imports) force companies to source U.S. materials.

Investment Case:
- Valuation: Stock rose 90% YTD but trades below its $27.86 price target.
- Demand Drivers: 92% of NdPr (key for EV/AI magnets) is used by the automotive and tech sectors.
- Risk: Volatile rare earth prices and reliance on government subsidies.

Conclusion: Shift Your Focus from “Too Big to Fail” to “Too Important to Ignore”

Cramer's regret over Alphabet isn't just a personal misstep—it's a sign that the era of unchecked mega-cap dominance is ending. Investors chasing AI's potential must look beyond the FAANGs to the enablers: companies like Powell Industries and MP Materials, which are building the grids, magnets, and supply chains that will power the next tech revolution.

Actionable Advice:
- Sell: Trim positions in Alphabet and other mega-caps facing regulatory and competitive headwinds.
- Buy: Allocate 5-10% of a tech portfolio to infrastructure plays like

and MP, which offer tangible growth and geopolitical tailwinds.

The future belongs not to the titans of today, but to the unsung heroes of tomorrow's AI infrastructure. Don't miss the train—investors who do may find themselves regretting it for years to come.

Sign up for free to continue reading

Unlimited access to AInvest.com and the AInvest app
Follow and interact with analysts and investors
Receive subscriber-only content and newsletters

By continuing, I agree to the
Market Data Terms of Service and Privacy Statement

Already have an account?

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet