Corporate Bitcoin Holdings Double in Two Months, Reaching 3.2% of Total Supply

Corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies are accelerating rapidly, with over 60 companies doubling their BTC holdings in just two months, surpassing even Michael Saylor’s renowned Strategy. This surge has pushed corporate-held Bitcoin to 3.2% of the total supply, highlighting a significant shift in institutional asset allocation toward digital currencies.

Geoff Kendrick, global head of digital asset research, cautions that while Bitcoin treasuries currently add buying pressure, they may also introduce future price volatility. The recent report reveals a remarkable trend: 61 corporate treasuries collectively own approximately 673,897 BTC, representing 3.2% of the total Bitcoin supply. This reflects a growing institutional confidence in Bitcoin as a treasury asset, driven by its potential to serve as a hedge against inflation and currency devaluation. Over the past two months, more than 60 companies have doubled their Bitcoin reserves, a pace that outstrips even the aggressive accumulation by Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which added 74,000 BTC in the same period.

Such rapid accumulation underscores a broader acceptance of Bitcoin within corporate finance strategies, signaling a shift from speculative investment to strategic treasury management. However, this trend also raises questions about market dynamics and the sustainability of such aggressive buying. Despite the bullish momentum, Kendrick emphasizes caution. The report notes that 58 of the 61 companies have net asset value (NAV) multiples above 1, indicating their market valuations exceed the value of their net assets. This discrepancy is currently attributed to market inefficiencies, including regulatory barriers and conservative investment committee processes that limit investor access.

Kendrick warns that as these inefficiencies diminish, corporate Bitcoin treasuries could become sources of downside price pressure and increased volatility. Additionally, the average purchase price for half of these companies exceeds $90,000 per BTC, significantly higher than Strategy’s average cost of $70,023. This pricing gap could expose many corporate holders to losses if Bitcoin’s price experiences a downturn, potentially triggering sell-offs that amplify market volatility.

New entrants continue to join the corporate Bitcoin treasury movement. A renewable energy developer recently announced its Bitcoin strategy, filing to open accounts for secure custody and services. This move reflects a growing trend among companies outside traditional tech and finance sectors to diversify their treasury assets with digital currencies. Similarly, a blockchain group disclosed a Bitcoin acquisition, while a crypto brokerage raised for BTC purchases. These developments illustrate the expanding geographic and sectoral diversity of corporate Bitcoin adopters, reinforcing the narrative of Bitcoin’s maturation as a mainstream treasury asset.

While Standard Chartered highlights potential risks, Michael Saylor and his Strategy maintain a confident outlook. Saylor has structured the company’s capital to withstand severe Bitcoin price declines, reportedly stable even if BTC falls 90% and remains depressed for several years. This resilience is designed to protect most stakeholders, except those leveraged at the top of the capital structure. Saylor’s approach exemplifies a long-term conviction in Bitcoin’s value proposition, contrasting with concerns about short-term volatility. His public statements and strategic moves continue to influence corporate Bitcoin adoption trends globally.

The rapid expansion of corporate Bitcoin treasuries marks a pivotal development in institutional cryptocurrency adoption. While this trend demonstrates growing confidence in Bitcoin as a strategic asset, it also introduces new dynamics that could affect market stability. Investors and corporate treasurers should carefully weigh the benefits of Bitcoin exposure against potential volatility risks. As adoption broadens, ongoing monitoring and prudent risk management will be essential to navigate this evolving landscape.