Connecticut Cracks Down on Unlicensed Betting; Robinhood Defends Federal Oversight

Generated by AI AgentNyra FeldonReviewed byDavid Feng
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2025 7:38 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Connecticut sued

, Kalshi, and Crypto.com for unlicensed sports betting via event contracts, citing consumer protection risks.

- State regulators ordered immediate cessation of unlicensed operations, emphasizing only Draft Kings, FanDuel, and Fanatics hold valid licenses.

- Robinhood defended its CFTC-regulated status, while Kalshi/Crypto.com remained silent, highlighting federal-state regulatory conflicts.

- Enforcement threats include civil/criminal penalties, underscoring Connecticut's crackdown on unlicensed operators in expanding betting markets.

Connecticut has launched a legal challenge against three major financial platforms—Robinhood, Kalshi, and Crypto.com—over their operations in the sports betting space. The state's Department of Consumer Protection issued cease-and-desist orders,

, alleging that the companies are offering unlicensed sports wagering through event contracts. The move underscores a growing regulatory focus on the boundaries of online gambling and prediction markets.

The orders demand that the firms immediately stop offering, promoting, or advertising any unlicensed gambling products to Connecticut residents

. State officials emphasized that none of the companies hold the necessary licenses to operate within the state's regulated sports betting framework . Only three entities—Draft Kings, FanDuel, and Fanatics—are authorized to offer wagering in Connecticut.

Robinhood responded by asserting that its event contracts are federally regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)

. The firm argued it operates under the supervision of a CFTC-registered entity and complies with federal standards. Kalshi and Crypto.com did not immediately respond to the state's allegations .

Why the Standoff Happened

Connecticut regulators argue that the platforms are violating state laws by offering wagers to individuals under the age of 21,

within the state. The cease-and-desist orders also highlight concerns about consumer protection, noting that these platforms operate outside of a regulated environment. This puts users at risk of financial loss and data insecurity .

Risks to the Outlook

Regulators have warned that failure to comply with the cease-and-desist orders could lead to civil or criminal penalties under Connecticut law

. The state's Gaming Division has emphasized the importance of adherence to licensing requirements and technical standards for betting platforms . The enforcement action signals a broader regulatory strategy to clamp down on unlicensed operators, particularly as more states expand their legal sports betting markets.

The development highlights the ongoing tension between state and federal regulatory frameworks. While federal agencies like the CFTC oversee certain financial derivatives, state governments maintain control over gaming and gambling laws. This jurisdictional overlap has created a legal gray zone for companies like Kalshi and

, which argue their operations are compliant with federal standards .

For now, Connecticut's action adds another layer of regulatory scrutiny to an already complex landscape. The outcome of similar legal battles in New York and Nevada could shape the broader regulatory approach to prediction markets and sports betting in the U.S. Investors and operators alike are watching closely, as the result could influence the future of the growing online betting industry.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet