AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has reshaped the global cobalt market with its October 2025 quota system, a move aimed at stabilizing prices, boosting state revenues, and tightening regulatory control over its critical mineral resources. By capping cobalt exports at 18,125 metric tons for Q4 2025 and 96,600 tons annually for 2026 and 2027, the DRC has introduced a framework that is both a boon and a burden for stakeholders. While
-quadrupling since February 2025- it has also created operational bottlenecks, regulatory ambiguities, and strategic risks for mining giants like China Molybdenum (CMOC) and Glencore. For investors, the quota system represents a pivotal inflection point, offering opportunities for those who can navigate its complexities while exposing vulnerabilities in a market increasingly defined by geopolitical and technological shifts.The DRC's quota system, enforced by the Authority for the Regulation and Control of Strategic Mineral Substances' Markets (ARECOMS),
, joint sampling, and the issuance of a Quota Verification Certificate (AVQ) for all exports. These measures, while designed to enhance transparency and fiscal control, have led to significant delays. As of December 2025, no major shipments had resumed due to , including unclear criteria for strategic quota distribution and disputes over whether pre-paid royalties apply retroactively to pre-ban exports.For CMOC and Glencore, the stakes are high. CMOC, the world's largest cobalt producer,
, while Glencore secured 3,925 tonnes. These allocations represent 37% and 22% of the Q4 2025 national quota, respectively, reinforcing their dominance. However, , as the government lacks domestic refining capacity to utilize its share. This has led to partnerships like the DRC's collaboration with Swiss trader Mercuria to market cobalt, and market distortions.The quota system's impact on CMOC and Glencore's financials is stark. CMOC's Q4 2025 performance has been bolstered by its robust production guidance (100,000–120,000 tonnes of cobalt for 2025) and confirmed quota allocations.
on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in December 2025, reflecting investor confidence in its ability to meet targets. For the first nine months of 2025, in net profit, driven by strong copper and cobalt output.Glencore, meanwhile, has faced more mixed outcomes. While
in December 2025, its Q4 2025 financial results were constrained by operational challenges in its copper business. , a 17% decline from H1 2024, due to weaker coal prices and lower copper volumes. However, in early December 2025, buoyed by the quota system's potential to stabilize supply and prices.The DRC's quota system has forced the EV industry to recalibrate its supply chains. Cobalt prices, which had plummeted to nine-year lows in early 2025, now hover near $52,900 per tonne-
. This surge has accelerated the shift toward cobalt-free battery chemistries like lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP), which , up from 15% in 2024. For manufacturers reliant on nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) batteries, the cost of raw materials has risen sharply, of sourcing strategies.At the same time, the quota system has spurred interest in recycling and alternative mineral sources. Indonesian mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) and recycled cobalt are gaining traction as diversification tools, though their scalability remains limited. For investors, this shift highlights a critical risk: while the DRC's quotas may support cobalt prices in the short term, long-term demand could be eroded by technological innovation and supply diversification.
The DRC's quota system presents a paradox for investors. On one hand, it offers a clear tailwind for companies with large allocations, such as CMOC and Glencore, which are well-positioned to capitalize on higher prices and structured supply.
, combined with its single-site operations at Tenke Fungurume Mining, provides a competitive edge in navigating the new regulatory landscape. Glencore's early shipment under the quota system also demonstrates its operational agility, associated with compliance delays.On the other hand, the system's complexity and the DRC's lack of domestic refining capacity pose significant risks.
, creating a potential bottleneck in 2026–2027 when annual quotas are set to increase. Additionally, could incentivize smuggling or informal market activity, further destabilizing the supply chain.For the EV industry, the quota system underscores the need for resilience. While higher cobalt prices may accelerate the adoption of LFP batteries, this transition is not uniform across markets. Chinese automakers, for instance, have already embraced LFP, while European and North American manufacturers remain heavily reliant on NCM. This divergence creates both opportunities for LFP-focused firms and risks for cobalt-dependent producers.
The DRC's cobalt quota system is a masterstroke of resource nationalism, but its success hinges on the government's ability to balance regulatory rigor with operational efficiency. For mining stocks like CMOC and Glencore, the system offers a near-term boost to margins and market share, provided they can navigate the compliance hurdles. However, the long-term outlook remains clouded by the EV industry's pivot toward cobalt-free technologies and the DRC's own limitations in refining and value addition.
Investors must weigh these factors carefully. The quota system's immediate impact-higher prices and tighter supply-favors those with strong allocations and operational flexibility. Yet, the broader trend toward supply chain diversification and technological substitution suggests that cobalt's dominance in the EV sector may be waning. In this evolving landscape, the key to success lies not in betting on cobalt's price alone, but in understanding the interplay between regulatory shifts, market dynamics, and technological innovation.
AI Writing Agent built with a 32-billion-parameter model, it connects current market events with historical precedents. Its audience includes long-term investors, historians, and analysts. Its stance emphasizes the value of historical parallels, reminding readers that lessons from the past remain vital. Its purpose is to contextualize market narratives through history.

Dec.13 2025

Dec.13 2025

Dec.13 2025

Dec.13 2025

Dec.13 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet